The encyclopedia · Software & IT · Strategic decision · 2015–2021
Twitter bought Periscope for $120M — then let it die over 5 years
Twitter acquired Periscope for $120M in 2015 before it even launched. Five years later, with declining usage and high maintenance costs, Twitter killed it.
Twitter · 2021-03-31
What happened
Periscope was founded in 2014 by Kayvon Beykpour and Joe Bernstein. The idea came to Beykpour during the 2013 Taksim Square protests in Istanbul — he could read about events on Twitter but could not see them. The company raised $1.5 million in seed funding before launching. In January 2015, before the product even publicly launched, Twitter acquired Periscope for approximately $120 million.
Periscope launched on March 26, 2015, and grew rapidly. By August 2015 — four months after launch — it had surpassed 10 million accounts, with viewers watching the equivalent of '40 years per day' of video. Apple named it iPhone App of the Year in 2015. But Periscope also faced challenges: it was used to pirate the Game of Thrones season 5 premiere and a Mayweather–Paquiao PPV fight, drawing 650+ takedown notices from the UFC.
By 2018, Periscope's usage was declining. Twitter had begun integrating Periscope's core features directly into its own app. On December 15, 2020, Twitter announced it would shut down Periscope, citing declining usage for 'approximately two years,' unsustainable maintenance costs, and a product realignment. The app was removed from app stores on March 31, 2021 — a $120 million acquisition that produced no direct revenue and was absorbed back into the platform that bought it.
Why it happened
- Twitter paid $120M for a pre-launch product — the highest price ever for a strategic bet on a social feature that already had a free, working competitor (Meerkat).
- Periscope never generated revenue — it was a free app with no ads, subscriptions, or business model, so it was a cost center from day one.
- When Twitter began integrating live-streaming into its own app, Periscope lost its reason to exist as a standalone product — it was absorbed back into the platform that bought it.
The lesson
Paying $120M for a pre-launch product to win a feature war is a bet the feature will be valuable enough to justify the cost. When it becomes a checkbox, the acquisition was never worth the price.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
A software change took Verizon's 5G core down 10 hrs — 2M lost calling, texting and 911
Meta's 'designed for privacy' glasses shipped users' intimate footage to Kenya reviewers
Microsoft 365 falls for five hours after a maintenance bug cut West US off the network
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.