Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2010

Nestlé tried to censor a Greenpeace KitKat parody — and made it go viral

Greenpeace swapped the KitKat logo for 'Killer' in a parody ad about palm oil. Nestlé threatened legal action. The video got millions more views.

Nestlé · 2010-03

What happened

In March 2010, Greenpeace released a viral video parodying a KitKat television commercial. In it, a man unwraps a KitKat to find a bloody orangutan finger. The message: Nestlé's palm oil supplier, Indonesia's Sinar Mas, was destroying rainforest and peatland, killing orangutans in the process.

Nestlé's response was to try to suppress the video. The company threatened legal action over trademark use and had the video removed from YouTube. The move triggered a textbook Streisand effect: the takedown drew far more attention than the original, and the video spread across social media with millions of additional views.

Greenpeace activists scaled Nestlé's London headquarters and hung a banner. Consumers flooded Nestlé's Facebook page. Within two months, Nestlé announced it would stop buying palm oil from suppliers linked to deforestation. The episode became a case study in how not to respond to a viral campaign.

Why it happened

  • Nestlé treated a public-relations problem as a legal one — trademark enforcement against a parody, which amplified the message instead of answering it.
  • The company had no social-media crisis playbook in 2010; its instinct was to control the channel, not the narrative.
  • The underlying supply-chain criticism was legitimate, so suppressing the messenger did nothing to address the substance.
What it costviral backlash; policy reversal in 2 monthsembarrassing

The lesson

Censoring a viral criticism is a marketing decision with a predictable outcome: more views. Answer the substance or say nothing; never sue the meme.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →