Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2012–2020

Naver rigged its own search to favor its own shops — Korea fined it ₩26.7B

Naver, South Korea's top search platform, tweaked its shopping and video algorithms to push its own services above rivals. In 2020 the KFTC fined it ₩26.7B.

Naver · 2020

What happened

Naver is South Korea's dominant search engine and internet portal. Its shopping and video services sit alongside its search results, and Naver controlled the algorithms that decided what users saw. From around 2012, the company adjusted those algorithms to give its own services a lift.

The changes pushed Naver's own Smart Store products and Naver TV content higher in shopping and video search results, while pushing competitors' offerings lower. Users searching for products or videos were steered toward Naver's own services, without being told the results had been tilted in Naver's favor.

On 6 October 2020, South Korea's Fair Trade Commission fined Naver ₩26.7 billion (about $23 million) — ₩26.5 billion for the shopping manipulation and ₩200 million for video. The KFTC found that Naver had abused its market-dominant position and engaged in unfair trade practices, misleading consumers and harming competitors. It was the first time South Korea had fined a technology platform for algorithmic changes that favored its own business.

The case was about the gatekeeper's temptation. Naver controlled the doorway through which users reached products and content, and it used that doorway to favor itself. The lesson is that a platform's search box is not its own storefront; tilting neutral results toward your own services is not merchandising, it is self-dealing, and a regulator will treat it as abuse.

Why it happened

  • Naver controlled the search algorithms that decided what users saw, and used that control to favor its own shopping and video services over competitors
  • The self-preferencing was hidden from users, who believed they were seeing neutral results, so the manipulation misled consumers as well as harming rivals
  • The KFTC found this was abuse of a market-dominant position and an unfair trade practice, and fined Naver ₩26.7 billion, the first such penalty against a Korean tech platform
  • A platform that controls access to a market faces a constant temptation to favor itself; acting on that temptation converts a neutral gateway into a rigged one
What it cost₩26.7B fine; first such ruling on a platformembarrassing

The lesson

Favoring your own services in results you control is self-dealing. Naver tilted its search toward its own shops; the KFTC fined it ₩26.7B for abuse of dominance. The search box is not a shop.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →