Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 1997

NatWest lost £90M on interest rate options — Kyriacos Papouis's rogue trades

NatWest lost £90M in 1997 when a trader named Kyriacos Papouis made unauthorized bets on interest rate options at the UK bank.

NatWest · 1997-06

What happened

NatWest (National Westminster Bank) was one of the UK's largest banks, part of the 'Big Four' clearing banks. In 1997, the bank's treasury operations in London included a desk trading interest rate options — derivatives that bet on the direction of UK interest rates.

Trader Kyriacos Papouis was responsible for NatWest's interest rate options book. He built up a large, unauthorized position in interest rate options that exceeded his trading limits. When interest rates moved against his position, the losses mounted to approximately £90 million ($150 million).

The loss was discovered by NatWest's internal risk control team and reported to the bank's senior management. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) launched an investigation into the incident. The scandal was one of several rogue trader incidents that hit UK banks in the 1990s, alongside Barings and Morgan Grenfell.

NatWest survived the loss, but the incident contributed to the bank's reputation for weak risk management. The case became a textbook example of how a single trader in a relatively small desk can generate outsized losses when internal controls are weak.

Why it happened

  • Kyriacos Papouis exceeded his authorized trading limits and built up a large position in interest rate options that the bank's risk controls did not detect in time.
  • NatWest's risk management systems were not equipped to monitor the size of Papouis's positions relative to the desk's limits — the trades were hidden until the losses were already large.
What it cost£90 million loss on interest rate optionscostly

The lesson

A trader in a single desk can lose £90M before anyone notices. NatWest learned in 1997 that interest rate options are the same as any other bet when the limits are not enforced.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →