Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 2012

Monte dei Paschi hid €2 billion in derivatives losses — the oldest bank needed a bailout

The world's oldest bank hid derivatives losses through secret contracts with Deutsche Bank and Nomura — the truth cost Italy a bailout.

Monte dei Paschi di Siena · Deutsche Bank · Nomura · 2012-11

What happened

Monte dei Paschi di Siena was founded in 1472, making it the oldest bank in the world still operating. In the 2000s, the bank's management pursued an aggressive expansion strategy financed by complex derivative transactions. Two operations in particular — named 'Santorini' in 2002 and 'Alexandria' in 2006 — were structured as hidden derivatives that the bank never disclosed to its own auditors or to Italy's central bank.

By 2009, those operations were generating huge losses. Rather than acknowledging them, top management led by bank president Giuseppe Mussari entered into even more complex derivative contracts with Deutsche Bank and Nomura to conceal the damage. The hidden losses grew to an estimated €500–750 million from the original operations, and a court later found that the bank had hidden a total of €2 billion in losses between 2008 and 2012. The documentation was never shared with the bank's auditors, shareholders, or the Banca d'Italia.

The scandal erupted in November 2012 when the bank's new board discovered the secret contracts and forwarded them to regulators. The revelation wiped more than 20% off the bank's share price in three days. On 26 January 2013, the Banca d'Italia approved a €3.9 billion bailout. In 2019, 13 former executives were convicted and sentenced to prison — including the ex-chairman and CEO who each received 7 years — while Deutsche Bank and Nomura were fined €160 million. Those convictions were overturned on appeal in 2022 and confirmed by Italy's highest court in 2023.

Why it happened

  • The bank's management chose to hide losses rather than acknowledge them, entering into secret derivative contracts that were deliberately concealed from auditors and regulators.
  • The expansion was financed through complex derivatives that the bank's leadership did not fully understand — the operations were structured to hide their true nature.
  • The concealment deepened over years — what started as an attempt to avoid reporting small losses turned into a growing pile of hidden liabilities that required ever more elaborate deception.
  • The bank's board and auditors failed to catch the hidden contracts for years, allowing the problem to grow from €500 million to a €2 billion hole.
What it cost€3.9bn bailout; €160m in finescostly

The lesson

A bank that hides its losses from its own auditors is not making a mistake — it is making a choice, and each year the choice is repeated the bill gets bigger.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →