The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Strategic decision · 2013
Microsoft promised a browser ballot screen, then accidentally skipped it for 14 months
Microsoft promised the EU a browser ballot screen in 2009, dropped it from Windows 7 SP1 for 14 months, and paid €561M for the oversight.
Microsoft · 2013-03-06
What happened
In 2007, Opera Software filed a complaint with the European Commission alleging Microsoft abused its PC-OS dominance by tying Internet Explorer to Windows. The Commission opened an investigation in January 2009, stating that bundling Internet Explorer “harms competition between web browsers, undermines product innovation and ultimately reduces consumer choice.” Facing a likely fine, Microsoft offered a remedy: a “ballot screen” displayed to new Windows users that let them choose from a dozen competing browsers. The Commission accepted the commitment in December 2009.
The ballot screen (BrowserChoice.eu) was delivered through Windows Update and worked as intended for about 13 months. But when Microsoft released Windows 7 Service Pack 1 in February 2011, the feature was silently dropped. For the next 14 months, approximately 15 million Windows users across Europe did not receive the choice screen. Microsoft continued to report to the Commission that the ballot screen was present, and the lapse went undetected until a routine monitoring report flagged the discrepancy in July 2012.
The European Commission reopened the case. In March 2013 it fined Microsoft €561 million for failing to comply with its legally binding commitment. Microsoft described the omission as a “technical error” and did not contest the fine. The company also extended its browser choice obligation by 15 months and agreed to enhanced monitoring and compliance reporting for five years.
Why it happened
- Microsoft agreed to the browser ballot screen only under regulatory pressure, treating it as a settlement cost rather than a binding commitment requiring procedural safeguards.
- The feature was dropped when Windows 7 SP1 was assembled, suggesting it was not integrated into Microsoft’s core development and release pipeline.
- Microsoft did not test for the presence of the ballot screen after the SP1 release, nor did the company have automated monitoring to catch regressions in compliance features.
- The company reported to the Commission that the ballot screen was still present without verifying the report, treating a regulatory commitment as a box to check rather than a live obligation.
The lesson
A regulatory commitment is only as strong as the internal controls you build around it. Microsoft’s technical error cost €561M — a price paid for treating compliance as someone else’s problem.
Aftermath
Microsoft paid the €561 million fine and extended its browser choice screen obligation by 15 months. The company also agreed to enhanced monitoring, including independent auditing of compliance with the commitment. The case established that the European Commission would enforce settlement promises with penalties, not just initial infringements. The BrowserChoice.eu screen remained active until Windows 8 made the ballot screen technically unnecessary through the operating system’s built-in browser choice architecture.
Sources
- European Union Microsoft competition case — Wikipedia (browser tying section, 2009 commitment, 14-month lapse, €561M fine)
- European Commission press release IP/13/196 — Commission fines Microsoft €561 million for failing to comply with browser choice commitments
- European Commission MEMO/13/196 — Frequently asked questions: Microsoft’s failure to comply with browser choice commitments and related fine
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Google forced Android makers to pre-install its search and paid €4.34B for the privilege
Amazon's €746M GDPR record fine was scrapped on a technicality
AliExpress got a €550M EU fine — the DSA's first big test landed on Alibaba
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.