The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2016
Marc Jacobs' dreadlock show — 'funny how you don't criticize women of color'
NYFW Sept 2016: mostly white models in rainbow dreadlocks; Jacobs first called critics narrow-minded, then apologised for his 'lack of sensitivity.'
Marc Jacobs · 2016-09
What happened
On September 15, 2016, the final day of New York Fashion Week, Marc Jacobs showed his spring-summer 2017 collection — a cast that included Kendall Jenner, Gigi and Bella Hadid, Karlie Kloss and Irina Shayk, mostly white models wearing rainbow-coloured faux dreadlocks. Critics asked immediately why the hairstyle, rooted in Black culture, had not come with Black models to wear it. The complaint was the same one fashion had been absorbing for years; Jacobs's answer to it was not.
Around September 17 he defended the styling on Instagram and went after the critics: 'funny how you don't criticize women of color for straightening their hair.' 'I respect and am inspired by people and how they look. I don't see color or race — I see people,' he wrote. 'I'm sorry to read that so many people are so narrow minded… Love is the answer.' He also posted screenshots of articles calling the uproar 'ridiculous.' The dismissal turned a styling complaint into a contempt one, and the backlash grew.
The next day, Sunday September 18, Jacobs posted again with a different register: he apologised for 'the lack of sensitivity unintentionally expressed by my brevity,' affirmed he 'wholeheartedly' believed in freedom of expression through art and clothes, and added: 'Of course I do "see" color but I DO NOT discriminate. THAT IS A FACT!' The collection was never the story again. The show joined fashion's running ledger of runway styling decisions delivered without the cultural context to carry them — and responses that made the ledger longer.
Why it happened
- The show staged a Black cultural style on a mostly white cast — the criticism wrote itself before the first review went up.
- The first response accused critics of narrow-mindedness and posted screenshots mocking the uproar, escalating a styling question into a fight.
- 'I don't see color' was offered as a defence of cultural borrowing, which is exactly what the critics said was wrong.
The lesson
The first reply is part of the design — Marc Jacobs' dreadlock apology had to repair his response before it could repair the show.
Aftermath
Jacobs apologised within a day and revisited the episode a year later, conceding the styling was insensitive; the SS17 collection's press coverage stayed anchored to the controversy. The case is cited alongside Gucci, Prada and Burberry in fashion's 2016–19 appropriation reckoning.
Sources
- Marc Jacobs apologises over dreadlock controversy at New York Fashion Week — BBC Newsbeat (Sep 19, 2016)
- Marc Jacobs apologises amid row over using white models with dreadlocks — The Guardian (Sep 20, 2016)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Comme des Garçons' cornrow wigs — 'never our intention to disrespect'
Off-White defined streetwear's golden era — then its founder died and LVMH sold at a loss
Alex and Ani — the $1B energy bracelet empire that collapsed in 5 years
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.