The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Technical decision · 2022
Mango Markets was drained of $110M by its own collateral rule
On Oct 11, 2022 one trader pumped Mango's MNGO token over 1,000% in under an hour, borrowed against the inflated price, and drained ~$110M from the protocol.
Mango Markets · 2022-10-11
What happened
Mango Markets was a decentralized lending platform where users could borrow against crypto collateral — and the value of that collateral was derived from prices on the platform's own perpetual futures markets, including its native token, MNGO. On 11 October 2022, trader Avraham Eisenberg exploited that design with two anonymous accounts: one sold a massive volume of MNGO perpetual futures while the other bought them, effectively trading with himself to create immense upward price pressure. The price of MNGO rose more than 1,000% in under an hour.
Because the smart contracts used the inflated MNGO price to determine borrowing power, Eisenberg's collateral value ballooned with the pump. He then borrowed against it and drained approximately $110 million worth of various cryptocurrencies from the protocol. Moments after the theft, he fled the United States. US Attorney Damian Williams called the scheme 'a brazen, old-fashioned con, but with a new-age twist'; the defense answered that Eisenberg had merely stress-tested a permissionless platform, an argument summarized as 'code is law.'
On 18 April 2024 a federal jury in Manhattan convicted Eisenberg of commodities fraud, commodities manipulation and wire fraud. Then on 23 May 2025 Judge Arun Subramanian vacated all three convictions: because the platform was permissionless and automatic, prosecutors had failed to prove materially false representations; the wire fraud count was dismissed on the ground that the behavior did not violate wire fraud law; and New York was ruled an improper venue. The Justice Department was left to decide whether to retry, while separate SEC and CFTC civil cases remained pending.
Why it happened
- The protocol priced collateral off its own perpetual futures market — a price one trader could move by trading with himself.
- The MNGO pump raised borrowing power in lockstep; ~$110 million left the protocol against collateral that existed only inside the manipulation.
- The convictions were vacated in 2025 — no false representation to a permissionless machine, improper venue — and the scheme outran the statutes.
The lesson
When a platform lends against a price it sets itself, that price is not collateral — it is an invitation. Mango was drained of $110M, and the convictions that followed were vacated.
Sources
- Enforcement News — Avi Eisenberg Convicted in Landmark $110M Mango Markets Fraud Trial
- CryptoNews — Judge Overturns Key Convictions in $110M Mango Markets Crypto Case, 23 May 2025
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Terra's 'stablecoin' UST lost its peg — and $40B in crypto value vanished in a week
Three Arrows Capital bet $10B on crypto — and the Terra collapse wiped it out in days
International Paper wrote off $2.47B of DS Smith goodwill a year after buying it
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.