The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · ~600 BCE
The lion gave up his teeth and claws for love — the farmer killed him
A lion fell in love with a farmer's daughter. To win her hand, he let the farmer file his teeth and cut his claws. Unarmed, the farmer killed him.
Aesop
From historyHistory and classical literature, legend included. An analogy to think with, not a modern precedent.
What it means today
In mergers, a company that restructures itself to suit an acquirer's preferences before a deal is signed — cutting costs, selling assets, removing poison pills — has given away its teeth before the farmer shows the club.
What happened
A lion fell in love with a farmer's daughter and asked for her hand in marriage. The farmer was too afraid to refuse outright. 'I would be honoured,' the farmer said, 'but my daughter is afraid of your teeth and claws. If you truly love her, let me remove them — then she will know you are safe.' The lion, eager to prove his devotion, agreed.
The farmer filed the lion's teeth to stubs and cut his claws to the quick. When the lion returned, unarmed and powerless, the farmer beat him to death with a club. The lion died for love — or, more precisely, for the illusion that his value to the farmer was the same as his value to his daughter.
The fable appears in Aesop's collections and has been retold as a cautionary tale in courtship and negotiation. The lion's error is not loving — the error is confusing the terms of two different relationships. The farmer's daughter might have valued gentleness. The farmer valued safety. The lion gave away the only thing the farmer feared, and with it the only leverage that kept the farmer honest.
Why it happened
- The lion accepted the farmer's framing that his teeth and claws were a problem — he evaluated himself through the farmer's interests, not his own
- The lion surrendered his only competitive advantage before verifying that the other side would honour the deal after the asymmetry was removed
- He confused the requirements of a romantic partner with the calculations of a strategic counterparty — two different relationships with two different sets of interests
The lesson
Never surrender your only source of leverage before the other side has committed to terms you can enforce. What makes you valuable in one relationship may be the only thing protecting you in another.
Aftermath
The fable is cited in negotiation theory as a warning against unilateral concessions. The phrase 'lion in love' entered early modern English literature as shorthand for a romantic fool who surrenders his nature for a prize that does not exist.
Sources
- Wikisource — Three Hundred Æsop's Fables: The Lion in Love
- Library of Congress, Read.gov — Aesop's Fables: 'The Lion in Love'
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Arcadia Group owned Topshop and Burton — administration in 2020 closed all stores
Starbucks opened six stores in Israel — all closed within two years
The fisherman freed the jinni from the bottle — and the jinni tried to kill him for it
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →
Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.