Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Sales & Retail · Marketing decision · 2025

A supplement seller told buyers its pills could replace blood-pressure medication

Laotangyou Health Tech pitched a gingko supplement as a stand-in for blood-pressure drugs and heart-disease treatment — Shanghai's regulator fined it ¥350,000.

Laotangyou Health Tech

What happened

Laotangyou Health Tech (上海老糖友健康科技), a Shanghai franchisee of the '天天营养' supplement brand, sold two products to older buyers: a gingko-leaf extract and a coenzyme Q10 and vitamin C blend. Staff pitched both in person and through private-domain livestreams, and the claims went well past a supplement's legal boundary — the gingko product, they said, could improve circulation, lower blood sugar and blood pressure, help with stroke and heart-attack damage, and 'replace blood-pressure medication' in treating coronary heart disease and angina.

The Q10 blend was pitched as something that could steady an irregular heart rate in coronary patients taking it twice a day — a second unlicensed disease-treatment claim riding alongside the first.

China's food-safety law is explicit that an ordinary supplement cannot claim to treat, prevent or replace medication for a named disease — that language is reserved for products cleared as pharmaceuticals, through a much higher bar of evidence. Telling a cardiac patient a supplement can stand in for their prescription doesn't just mislead a buyer about value; it invites someone to alter or skip medication that is actually controlling their condition.

Shanghai's Yangpu district market regulator investigated and fined the company ¥350,000 under the anti-unfair-competition law, one of six cases the city's market regulator named in an October 2025 batch targeting false health claims aimed at elderly consumers.

Why it happened

  • A supplement claiming to 'replace medication' isn't an exaggerated pitch — it can change how a patient manages a real condition, which is why regulators treat it more seriously than ordinary puffery.
  • The claim worked on the population with the most to lose: buyers managing a diagnosed heart condition, for whom skipping a real prescription on a salesperson's word carries real risk.
What it cost¥350,000 fineembarrassing

The lesson

A health claim that tells a buyer to change how they treat a real diagnosis isn't marketing exaggeration — it's the exact claim regulators built the higher evidence bar to stop.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →