The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Operational decision · 2021–2025
Kuajing Haoyun (跨境好运) raised from Temasek to link sellers with freight — then vanished
A Shenzhen platform connecting 36,000 cross-border sellers and 1,000+ freight providers. In June 2025 it collapsed — employees dismissed, the legal rep gone.
Kuajing Haoyun (跨境好运)
What happened
Kuajing Haoyun (跨境好运), registered as Douhaoyun (Shenzhen) Technology Co., was founded in February 2021 as a freight-forwarding platform connecting small and medium cross-border e-commerce sellers with logistics providers. It offered route comparison, transaction guarantees, insurance and end-to-end tracking, aggregating more than 1,000 service providers and serving nearly 36,000 sellers at its peak.
In 2021 the company raised hundreds of millions of yuan in a round that included global investment firm Temasek. The money funded rapid growth in a sector riding the cross-border e-commerce boom. But the model generated thin margins — the platform took a cut of transactions that was never enough to cover operations at scale, and every new seller added more support cost than platform revenue.
By mid-2025 the industry was under pressure from US tariff policy changes, rising advertising costs (Amazon CPC up 15.1% in 2024, TikTok CPM up 12.28% YoY) and the cancellation of the de minimis $800 exemption, which raised freight costs roughly 25%. In June 2025 Kuajing Haoyun suddenly announced closure. Employees were dismissed, the legal representative Zhong Jinzhu lost contact, and sellers who had prepaid for freight services could not recover their money. The platform that had connected nearly 36,000 sellers to international logistics was gone in days.
Why it happened
- Transaction-based platform economics failed at scale — the cut from each freight order was too thin to cover operations, support and technology costs for 36,000 sellers and 1,000 providers.
- The business relied on continued cross-border e-commerce growth and friendly trade policies — when US tariffs rose and the de minimis exemption ended, the platform's margin disappeared.
- Temasek's name drew in sellers and partners but the funding round did not build a sustainable business — once capital stopped flowing the model had no operating margin to survive on.
The lesson
A platform that connects two sides of a transaction survives only if the margin per match covers the cost of making it. When the market moves against both sides, there is no cushion.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Wanwuji was an e-commerce unicorn. The hollow model collapsed, 1200 suppliers unpaid.
JD.com spent 8 years in SE Asia and never broke 1M users against Shopee's 31M
Amazon spent $75M on Joyo — then ceded China's e-commerce to Alibaba and JD
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.