The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2015–2022
Kirin bought into Myanmar with a military partner — when the coup came, it had no way out
Kirin's US$500 million Myanmar brewery joint venture with a military-linked conglomerate became untenable after the 2021 coup, forcing a billion-yen loss
Kirin Holdings · 2015-08
What happened
Kirin Holdings, Japan's largest beer company, entered Myanmar in 2015 by purchasing Fraser and Neave's 51% stake in Myanmar Brewery and Mandalay Brewery for roughly US$500 million. The remaining 49% was held by Myanma Economic Holdings Limited (MEHL), a conglomerate controlled by the Myanmar military's Union Solidarity and Development Association. Myanmar was one of Asia's fastest-growing beer markets, and Kirin saw the joint venture as a gateway to Southeast Asia.
Human rights groups criticised Kirin's partnership with MEHL from the start, citing the military's record of human rights abuses. Kirin suspended dividend payments to MEHL in November 2020, months before the military coup. On February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military overthrew the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi, triggering international sanctions and a wave of corporate withdrawals from the country.
Kirin announced its intention to exit Myanmar in 2021. After lengthy negotiations, the company completed a share buyback scheme on June 30, 2022, selling its 51% stake back to the joint venture for 22.4 billion yen (about US$243 million). The sale price was significantly lower than the original investment, and Kirin stated it would make no profit on the transaction. The buyback was structured to transfer ownership to the military-linked partner, critics said.
The exit was denounced by human rights groups as 'irresponsible' — by selling to the military partner rather than liquidating the business, Kirin effectively handed the Myanmar military a valuable asset that continued generating revenue. The company defended the buyback as the only option that protected local employees, business partners, and communities.
Why it happened
- Kirin entered a joint venture with a military-linked conglomerate without a human rights due diligence framework or an exit plan for the day the partnership became untenable.
- The company's strategic focus on Myanmar's fast-growing beer market blinded it to the political and reputational risk of partnering with a military-controlled entity.
- Kirin had no legal or contractual mechanism to force a clean exit when the coup came. The only viable option was a buyback that handed the military a windfall.
- The company's delay in exiting — announcing in 2021 but not completing the sale until June 2022 — allowed the military partner to extract additional value from the business.
The lesson
A partnership with a politically exposed entity is a contingent liability. When the politics shift, the partnership becomes a trap — and the exit costs more than the entry.
Aftermath
Kirin completed its Myanmar exit in June 2022, selling its 51% stake to the joint venture. The company recorded a significant loss. The Myanmar military continued to operate the breweries through MEHL. Kirin's experience became a case study in the risks of operating in politically unstable markets, and the company strengthened its human rights due diligence. The broader Myanmar beer market contracted after the coup, with Heineken and Carlsberg also reviewing their operations.
Sources
- ABC News — 'Messy' exit for parent company of Aussie beers from Myanmar after coup
- Reuters — Japan's Kirin exits Myanmar business with military-linked partner
- Reuters — Japan brewer Kirin to exit Myanmar, seek sale of two units
- Business & Human Rights Resource Centre — Japanese beer giant Kirin cuts ties with Myanmar junta
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Sapporo spent $250M on US craft beer and closed both acquisitions within a decade
Takarayama Sake Brewery, a 139-year-old Niigata sake maker, bankrupt in 2024
Sabeco: Vietnam's state-owned beer champion lost its crown to Heineken
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.