Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2015

Kalyan Jewellers' ad showed a star and a dark-skinned child — the internet called it out

A 2015 print ad showed Aishwarya Rai reclining while a dark-skinned boy held a parasol over her. Critics called it racist. Kalyan pulled the ad and apologised.

Kalyan Jewellers

What happened

In April 2015, Kalyan Jewellers, one of India's largest jewellery chains, published a print advertisement featuring Bollywood actress Aishwarya Rai Bachchan reclining on a couch while a dark-skinned young boy held a parasol over her. The image was meant to evoke luxury and royalty. What it evoked instead was a colonial tableau — a light-skinned woman being served by a dark-skinned child.

The backlash was immediate and international. An open letter to the actress called the ad 'insidiously racist' and described the child's positioning as evoking slavery. Social media amplified the criticism across India and beyond. The ad became a case study in how visual shorthand — parasol, reclining figure, attending child — carries historical weight that a creative team may not intend but cannot disclaim.

Kalyan Jewellers withdrew the advertisement and issued an apology. The brand survived, but the ad became a permanent reference point in discussions about race, skin colour and advertising in India — a market where fairness-cream marketing had long normalised the very hierarchy the ad was accused of dramatising.

Why it happened

  • The creative team used colonial-era visual shorthand without recognising — or caring — that the imagery would be read as racial hierarchy.
  • No review process flagged the ad's racial implications before it was published across multiple markets.
  • India's own fairness-cream industry had normalised skin-colour hierarchies in advertising, creating a blind spot for this kind of imagery.
  • The celebrity's involvement amplified the backlash: the ad was not just a brand's mistake, it was a public figure's association with it.
What it costad pulled; brand apology; lasting reputational stainembarrassing

The lesson

An advertisement's meaning is not what the creative team intended; it is what the audience sees. If your visual shorthand has a history, that history is in the ad whether you put it there or not.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →