Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2013–2025

Kaisa Group borrowed against its land bank twice — and defaulted twice

Shenzhen developer Kaisa was China's first offshore-bond defaulter in 2015 — then defaulted again in 2021, needing four more years to restructure $12B in debt.

Kaisa Group Holdings · 2021-12-09

What happened

Kaisa Group built itself into one of Shenzhen's largest property developers by borrowing heavily to buy land, funding the purchases with offshore dollar bonds and, in its early years, wealth management products sold directly to retail investors. The land bank was the collateral for the next round of debt, and the next round of debt bought the next parcel of land — a cycle that only worked as long as apartment sales and refinancing kept pace with it.

In late 2014 a government freeze on some of Kaisa's Shenzhen projects cut off its cash, and in April 2015 Kaisa missed interest payments on roughly $1 billion of dollar bonds, becoming the first Chinese property company to default on offshore debt. It restructured that debt and kept building.

The same funding model failed again in December 2021: Kaisa let an offer to extend a $400 million bond lapse, and Fitch declared the company in default on December 9, 2021, within days of Evergrande's own default. By then Kaisa carried roughly $12 billion in offshore bonds — second only to Evergrande among Chinese developers — atop total liabilities that reached 226.4 billion yuan (about $31 billion) as its restructuring dragged on.

A restructuring plan finally won creditor support in August 2024, offering bondholders new notes and mandatory convertible bonds in place of the defaulted debt. It took until September 15, 2025 — nearly four years after the second default — for the exchange to close, swapping roughly $10.4 billion of claims into new securities listed in Singapore.

Why it happened

  • Land banking funded by short-dated offshore bonds and retail wealth management products left Kaisa needing continuous refinancing; any interruption to sales or credit access became a liquidity crisis.
  • Kaisa had already lived through this exact failure mode in 2015 and returned to the same debt-funded expansion afterward rather than deleveraging.
  • By 2021, bondholders were repaid only after asset sales, equity dilution and years of talks — the land bank was collateral, but it could not turn into cash on the schedule the debt required.
What it cost$400M bond default; $12B restructured over ~4 yearscostly

The lesson

A financing model that already failed once does not become safer the second time it is scaled back up. Land banking funded by short-term debt only works while refinancing stays open.

Aftermath

Kaisa's offshore restructuring became effective September 15, 2025, exchanging defaulted claims for new notes and convertible bonds listed on the Singapore Exchange. The company remained in workout mode with domestic creditors and continued to sell assets to raise cash.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →