Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2019–2024

Julius Baer booked Rene Benko's Signa empire as many borrowers, not one

The Swiss bank's private-debt unit booked Signa Group's separate companies as separate borrowers, and a single Signa collapse wiped out half its 2023 profit.

Julius Baer · Signa Group · 2024-02-01

What happened

Julius Baer's private-debt arm built up a large book of loans to entities within Signa Group, the Austrian property and retail conglomerate controlled by Rene Benko, owner of Berlin's KaDeWe department store and a stake in Selfridges. Internally, credit exposures to the different Signa companies were booked as separate borrowers rather than as essentially the same one — so no single limit ever flagged how concentrated the bank had become in one over-leveraged group.

One loan, worth around 150 million euros, was secured against Oberpollinger, a Munich department store owned by Signa Prime Selection, but the collateral was a share pledge rather than the building itself. When Signa filed for one of Europe's largest corporate insolvencies in November 2023, that structure gave Julius Baer far less to recover than a direct claim on the property would have.

Julius Baer initially set aside only 70 million Swiss francs against the exposure. By February 2024 it had recognised a full loss allowance of roughly 586 million francs (about $679 million) on its Signa-linked private debt, an amount that cut its 2023 net profit by more than half.

Chairman Romeo Lacher told shareholders that 'the evolution of the private debt business outpaced the adjustment of its framework' — the unit had grown faster than the risk controls meant to govern it, and risk managers did not have a full handle on the complexity of the Benko loans.

Why it happened

  • Loans to different Signa entities were tracked as if they were different borrowers, masking a concentration in one group and one man's leveraged property empire.
  • At least one large loan was secured by a share pledge rather than the underlying real estate, leaving weaker recovery rights when the borrower failed.
  • The private-debt business scaled up faster than the risk framework meant to constrain it, so growth outran the controls that should have capped single-name exposure.
What it cost~CHF 586M writedown, over half of 2023 net profitcostly

The lesson

A borrower split across many legal entities is still one borrower. Aggregate exposure by the real credit risk, not by the shell it is booked under, and lend against assets you can actually seize.

Aftermath

CEO Philipp Rickenbacher stepped down on 1 February 2024 with deputy CEO Nic Dreckmann taking over on an interim basis; board risk-committee chair David Nicol said he would not seek re-election. Julius Baer announced it was exiting the private-debt business altogether, winding down roughly CHF 800 million in remaining private-credit assets and refocusing lending on Lombard and mortgage loans, alongside board and executive pay cuts.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →