The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2017
Juewei Duck Neck's Double 11 ads read like innuendo — the regulator fined them ¥600K
A Tmall poster showed a woman in shackles with the slogan 'Fresh, tender, juicy — want some?' The AIC fined both the brand and its agency.
Juewei Food · 2017-11
What happened
For the 2017 Double 11 (Singles' Day) promotion, Juewei Duck Neck (绝味鸭脖), China's largest duck-neck snack chain, published two online advertisements. On 1 November, its Tmall flagship store displayed a cartoon of a woman wearing short shorts, lying on a bed with shackles, legs apart, under the slogan: '鲜嫩多汁,想要吗?' ('Fresh, tender, juicy — want some?'). On 3 November, its WeChat account posted an image of the David statue's private parts pixelated, with copy written in the tone of intimate partners.
Additional WeChat posts titled '我不搞预售,我就是玉兽' ('I don't do pre-sales, I am a jade beast') and '高潮' ('Climax') were deleted by WeChat for 'vulgarity, sexual suggestion, or pornographic information.' The Tmall poster was removed on 2 November after public outcry; Juewei posted an apology on Weibo the same day.
On 22 December 2017, the Changsha Municipal Administration of Industry and Commerce fined both Changsha Juewei Food Marketing Co. and Changsha Huibang Advertising Co. (the agency) ¥600,000 each, totalling ¥1.2 million, citing Article 9(7) of the Advertising Law. Juewei's listed parent removed the marketing subsidiary's person in charge, withheld the e-commerce team's quarterly bonus, and mandated one month of Advertising Law training.
Why it happened
- The creative mapped product attributes ('fresh, tender, juicy') onto a sexualised image, treating the double entendre as clever rather than recognising the audience would read it as objectification
- The agency and the brand shared the same approval blind spot — neither flagged the Tmall poster or WeChat posts as crossing the Advertising Law's 'good social customs' line before publication
- The Double 11 promotion cycle rewards attention-grabbing creative under time pressure, which pushes teams toward provocation without a compliance checkpoint between 'edgy' and 'illegal'
The lesson
Sexual innuendo in ad copy is a legal risk, not just a taste risk — China's Advertising Law Article 9(7) fines both the brand and the agency, and the regulator names both in the penalty decision.
Aftermath
The case was cited in Chinese advertising-industry roundups of 2017's worst campaigns. Juewei's listed parent (绝味食品股份有限公司, stock code 603517) issued a public apology letter on 22 December 2017. The case became a standard reference in Chinese marketing compliance training for the principle that both the advertiser and the advertising operator bear liability under the Advertising Law.
Sources
- Sina Finance: Juewei Duck Neck fined ¥600K for vulgar Double 11 ads
- Sohu: Juewei Duck Neck Double 11 ad controversy and penalty details
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
A snack brand called itself 'nationwide No.1 in sales' on a survey nobody could check
Haihe Milk's livestream host used sexual innuendo to sell milk
A Guilin bakery turned a nearby earthquake into a '520' promotion
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.