The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2022–2023
Jubensha 剧本杀: 45,000 murder-mystery stores in two years — then the ¥62 price war
China's script-murder boom went from 2,400 to 45,000 stores in two years — then spend collapsed to ¥62 and shops sold for ¥0.
剧本杀门店行业 · 2022-08-13
What happened
The script-murder store boom was China's fastest retail fad of 2019–2021. The TV show 明星大侦探 lit the fuse in 2016; by December 2019 the number of stores had jumped from 2,400 to 12,000, past 30,000 by the end of 2020 and 45,000 by April 2021. The market crossed 10 billion yuan in 2019 (up 68%) and reached 11.74 billion in 2020 — but growth had already collapsed to 7%, while the opening wave kept rolling.
The price war of 2022 broke it. Average spend per game fell from ¥247 in 2019 to ¥82 in 2020 and ¥62 in 2021 — a floor at which operators said no shop could profit. Stores were offered for zero-yuan transfer and found no takers; one operator estimated half the industry was closing. Registrations being cancelled rose from 350-plus in 2019 to over 1,000 in 2021 and 500-plus by August 2022 alone; industry revenue for 2022 was forecast to shrink about 3 billion yuan, and total financing for the year dropped to 236 million.
By 2023 the washout was personal: one brand owner closed three stores and lost over 3 million yuan, a franchisee lost 400,000 in under six months and begged for any handover that returned his deposit. Veteran customers were leaving at a reported 40–50% rate, script fairs shrank from about 200 publishers to 70–110, and the category settled into a long, quiet shake-out.
Why it happened
- Entry was nearly free of barriers: fit-out cost 300,000–1,000,000 yuan and anyone could join, so supply surged from 2,400 stores to 45,000 — faster than demand could follow.
- The product was copyable: pirated and cloned scripts flooded the market, so the content moat that should have protected margins collapsed and every store sold the same five stories.
- The cost structure could not take the fall: fit-out, script purchases and DM wages were fixed, while average spend fell from ¥247 to ¥62 — a price war financed by the founders' own capital.
- The 2022 funding chill took away the only cash that kept marginal shops alive: financing for the whole category fell to 236 million yuan for the year.
The lesson
A fad anyone can enter is a race to the bottom everyone pays for: 45,000 stores selling the same scripts pushed spend from ¥247 to ¥62 a game — oversupply wrote the bill.
Aftermath
The shake-out continued through 2023 and beyond: closures at the bottom, consolidation at the top, and survivors migrating to costlier formats like immersive theatres that could not be cloned. The boom's lesson settled into the vocabulary of Chinese retail — a cautionary tale cited whenever a low-barrier format floods: 无人货架, shared bikes and script-murder stores all followed the same curve of hype, oversupply and zero-yuan handovers.
Sources
- 中国经营报 (via 新浪财经), 15 May 2021 — 盗版、抄袭问题待解 百亿剧本杀游戏虚火正旺? (2019 market over ¥10B, +68%; 2020 ¥11.74B, +7%; stores 2,400 → 12,000 by Dec 2019; fit-out cost ¥300K–1M; price per game ¥128–188; piracy problem)
- 南方周末, 27 August 2022 — 剧本杀的转型难题:"内容的池子根本不够烧" (企查查: cancellations 350+ in 2019, 1,000+ in 2021, 500+ by Aug 2022; 2021 market ¥12B+ with 30,000+ stores; 2022 revenue to shrink ~¥3B, growth forecast −35%)
- 南方都市报 (via 东方财富), 13 August 2022 — 剧本杀价格战遭反噬 零元转让店铺无人接盘 (stores 2,400 → 12,000 → 30,000+ → 45,000 by Apr 2021; spend ¥247 → ¥82 → ¥62; observed closure rate 50%+; zero-yuan transfers; 2022 financing ¥236M; revenue ~¥20B → ¥17B)
- Tech星球 (via 百家号), 23 December 2023 — 商家血亏300万,门店0元转让,剧本杀凉透了? (owner closed 3 stores losing ¥3M+; franchisee lost ¥400K in under six months; veteran customers leaving 40–50%; script-fair publishers 200 → 70–110)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Bluegogo 小蓝单车: the bike-share #3 that burned ¥400M and left suppliers unpaid
Macau's Jockey Club lost MOP 2.5 billion across 44 years, then quit 18 years early
China's 2021 crackdown sliced $300B+ from Tencent — and forced it to restructure
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.