Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2010

Instagram started as a failed check-in app — Burbn was too complicated, photos saved it

Kevin Systrom raised $500K to build a check-in app called Burbn. It was too similar to Foursquare. He stripped it to photos and filters. Instagram sold for $1B.

Instagram · Meta · 2010-10-06

What happened

In March 2010, Kevin Systrom closed a $500,000 seed funding round from Baseline Ventures and Andreessen Horowitz for Burbn, a mobile check-in app. Burbn let users check in at locations, post plans, earn points for hanging out with friends, and share photos. The problem was that it tried to do too much — and the check-in market already had a dominant player: Foursquare.

Systrom and his co-founder Mike Krieger realised Burbn was too complicated and too similar to existing apps. Users were not checking in, but they were taking photos. The two founders made a brutal decision: strip everything except photo upload, commenting, and liking. They added filters — inspired by Systrom's girlfriend's reluctance to post photos that didn't look artistic — and renamed the app Instagram, a portmanteau of 'instant camera' and 'telegram.'

Instagram launched on October 6, 2010. It grew to 100,000 users in a week, 1 million in two months, and 10 million in a year. On April 9, 2012, Facebook announced it would acquire Instagram for $1 billion in cash and stock. The deal closed in September 2012. A check-in app that nobody wanted had become the most successful photo-sharing platform in the world — because the founders recognised that the feature users actually used was worth more than the product they had planned to build.

Why it happened

  • Burbn tried to compete with Foursquare on its own turf — a check-in market that was already defined — instead of finding a gap that Foursquare could not fill.
  • The app was too complicated: check-ins, plans, points, and photos all fighting for attention. Users didn't know what Burbn was for.
  • Systrom and Krieger nearly shipped a mediocre check-in app instead of a world-class photo app — the pivot required abandoning months of work on a feature set that had already been funded.
What it cost$500K seed round for a check-in app nobody wantedlucky mistake

The lesson

A product that tries to do everything does nothing. The mistake was building a feature set instead of a product — and the luck was recognising it before the money ran out.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →