The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025
Instacart advertised 'free delivery' and a '100% guarantee' it didn't honor
Instacart's ads promised free first-time delivery and full refunds. The FTC said neither was true, and hidden Instacart+ enrollment cost customers more.
Instacart · 2025-12-18
What happened
Instacart's marketing told first-time customers their delivery was free, then charged a separate 'service fee' at checkout that covered the same cost under another name. Its site also advertised a '100% satisfaction guarantee,' which the FTC said Instacart did not honor with full refunds when customers complained.
Alongside the ad claims, the FTC alleged Instacart enrolled customers into its paid Instacart+ membership without clearly disclosing the terms or getting their express consent — a pattern the agency has pursued against subscription businesses broadly, but here layered directly on top of the free-delivery and guarantee claims that had drawn customers in.
On 18 December 2025, Instacart settled the FTC's lawsuit for $60 million in consumer refunds, reaching hundreds of thousands of customers. The proposed order bars the company from repeating the free-delivery, satisfaction-guarantee and hidden-enrollment claims, and requires clear disclosure and affirmative consent before charging for Instacart+ going forward. Instacart also agreed to end AI-driven price testing named in the same action.
Why it happened
- 'Free delivery' was advertised on the front end while a same-cost fee was added at checkout, so the saving customers were sold never existed as described.
- A '100% satisfaction guarantee' was marketed as a blanket promise without the internal policy to back full refunds, so the claim outran what the company actually did for complaining customers.
- Subscription enrollment was designed around minimal disclosure rather than express consent, extracting recurring revenue from customers who had not clearly agreed to it.
The lesson
An ad claim has to match the policy behind it — 'free' must mean free once fees are added, and a 'guarantee' must be backed by real refunds. Regulators read a claim the way a customer does.
Aftermath
The settlement required Instacart to overhaul its disclosure and consent flows for Instacart+ and stop the challenged ad claims outright, and the case became a reference point in later FTC subscription-enforcement actions against other platforms.
Sources
- Federal Trade Commission — Instacart to Pay $60 Million in Consumer Refunds to Settle FTC Lawsuit
- CBS News — Instacart to pay $60 million in refunds after feds allege it deceived customers
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Glossier built a $1.8B DTC brand — then stores and a failed line extension drained it
Fashion rental firm CaaStle filed for Chapter 7 after a $510 million fraud
Soleply built a sneaker resale chain in 4 years — high-interest debt bankrupted it
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.