案例库 · 广告与公关 · 市场决策 · 2025
这条还没译成中文,下面是英文原文。
Instacart advertised 'free delivery' and a '100% guarantee' it didn't honor
Instacart's ads promised free first-time delivery and full refunds. The FTC said neither was true, and hidden Instacart+ enrollment cost customers more.
Instacart · 2025-12-18
怎么回事
Instacart's marketing told first-time customers their delivery was free, then charged a separate 'service fee' at checkout that covered the same cost under another name. Its site also advertised a '100% satisfaction guarantee,' which the FTC said Instacart did not honor with full refunds when customers complained.
Alongside the ad claims, the FTC alleged Instacart enrolled customers into its paid Instacart+ membership without clearly disclosing the terms or getting their express consent — a pattern the agency has pursued against subscription businesses broadly, but here layered directly on top of the free-delivery and guarantee claims that had drawn customers in.
On 18 December 2025, Instacart settled the FTC's lawsuit for $60 million in consumer refunds, reaching hundreds of thousands of customers. The proposed order bars the company from repeating the free-delivery, satisfaction-guarantee and hidden-enrollment claims, and requires clear disclosure and affirmative consent before charging for Instacart+ going forward. Instacart also agreed to end AI-driven price testing named in the same action.
为什么会这样
- 'Free delivery' was advertised on the front end while a same-cost fee was added at checkout, so the saving customers were sold never existed as described.
- A '100% satisfaction guarantee' was marketed as a blanket promise without the internal policy to back full refunds, so the claim outran what the company actually did for complaining customers.
- Subscription enrollment was designed around minimal disclosure rather than express consent, extracting recurring revenue from customers who had not clearly agreed to it.
教训
An ad claim has to match the policy behind it — 'free' must mean free once fees are added, and a 'guarantee' must be backed by real refunds. Regulators read a claim the way a customer does.
后来呢
The settlement required Instacart to overhaul its disclosure and consent flows for Instacart+ and stop the challenged ad claims outright, and the case became a reference point in later FTC subscription-enforcement actions against other platforms.
资料来源
- Federal Trade Commission — Instacart to Pay $60 Million in Consumer Refunds to Settle FTC Lawsuit
- CBS News — Instacart to pay $60 million in refunds after feds allege it deceived customers
发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。
类似的案例
这家公司栽倒的地方,别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →

Comments · 0
登录 后就能评论。