Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026

Indosat pulled an IM3 ad that equated zakat calls with scam calls after protest

'Calls inviting zakat — don't answer, might be a scammer': the anti-fraud message on public transport stigmatised a pillar of Islam, and Indosat pulled it.

Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison · 2026-04-04

What happened

In Ramadhan 2026, IM3 — the consumer brand of Indonesia's Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison — ran out-of-home ads on public transport with an anti-scam message: 'Telpon Ngajak Zakat, Jangan Diangkat! Jangan-jangan Scammer' — calls inviting you to pay zakat, don't answer, it might be a scammer. The campaign was meant to warn about fraud committed in zakat's name, which by 2025 data had risen 34.7%.

POROZ, the association of Indonesian zakat-management organisations, protested on 3 April 2026. Zakat is one of the five pillars of Islam, and POROZ chairman Bukhori Muslim said the ad stigmatised a religious obligation by equating zakat invitations with scamming. The narrative, POROZ argued, would make people doubt the pickup and education services run by official zakat institutions — amil working under Law 23/2011. It demanded a public apology in national media and withdrawal of all campaign materials.

On 4 April 2026 Indosat apologised. Ovidia Nomia, SVP Head of Corporate Communications, said there was never intent to offend religious values or any group, that the message was prompted by rising zakat-named fraud during Ramadhan, and that as a form of responsibility all campaign materials had been pulled and stopped across every channel.

Why it happened

  • An anti-fraud message needs an example — choosing a pillar of Islam as the example moved the stigma from scammers onto the ritual itself.
  • The ad's audience included the very donors zakat institutions depend on: telling them not to answer zakat calls undercut the institutions' own services.
  • Religious-sensitivity review was the gap: the fraud-prevention intent was real, but no wording check caught what 'zakat = scam' would read as.
What it costcampaign pulled from all channels; public apologyembarrassing

The lesson

Anti-fraud campaigns need a neutral example: borrowing a religious obligation as stand-in bait stigmatises the ritual and turns its institutions into your critics.

Aftermath

Indosat said the withdrawal followed a comprehensive evaluation and reaffirmed the campaign's anti-fraud intent as Ramadhan scams rose. POROZ had demanded the apology run in national print and digital media and on the company's official social channels — the standard it set for making such a campaign right.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →