The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Operational decision · 2015–2024
IKEA bought into Romanian forests — then investigators linked its wood to protected areas
IKEA's owner became Romania's largest private forest owner. Two 2024 investigations tied its land and suppliers to old-growth logging claims.
IKEA · Ingka Investments · 2024-04-25
What happened
Ingka Investments, part of the IKEA system, bought Romanian forestland from 2015 and became the country's largest private forest owner, with about 51,000 hectares in Romania. IKEA also relied on Romanian manufacturers and suppliers for furniture sold across Europe.
In April 2024, Agent Green and Bruno Manser Fonds examined nine Romanian forest areas: seven owned by Ingka and two public forests linked to IKEA's supply chain. They reported more than 50 suspected forestry-law violations or poor-management practices, including intensive felling, soil damage from logging roads and logging in forests that overlapped EU protected areas.
Greenpeace separately linked seven manufacturers supplying IKEA products to wood from high-conservation-value forests in the Romanian Carpathians, including Natura 2000 sites. It said at least 30 products from those suppliers, including Ingolf chairs and Sniglar baby cribs, were found in IKEA stores across 13 countries.
IKEA and Ingka strongly disputed the findings. Inter IKEA said its review found no wrongdoing, that suppliers complied with local and EU rules, and that authorities had approved the logging. The investigations nevertheless turned IKEA's forest ownership and sourcing model into a public test of whether legal timber paperwork was enough for a biodiversity-risk supply chain.
Why it happened
- Owning forests and buying from nearby processors gave IKEA more control over timber supply, but also made it responsible for forest-management choices rather than only supplier paperwork.
- The sourcing system relied on legal permits, traceability records and certification even where campaigners said old and biodiverse forests needed stricter protection than the minimum rules supplied.
- A furniture supply chain spread across many suppliers and countries made local logging disputes travel with products into IKEA stores across Europe.
The lesson
Legal timber documents are not the same as biodiversity assurance. If a brand buys forests or dominates suppliers, it must audit ecological risk before wood enters products.
Aftermath
Agent Green, Bruno Manser Fonds and Ingka planned talks in June 2024. Greenpeace urged IKEA to remove old-growth destruction from its supply chain; IKEA denied wrongdoing and said the sourcing complied with law.
Sources
- Mongabay — IKEA blamed for Romanian forest destruction
- Greenpeace — IKEA furniture linked to Romanian old-growth forests
- Bruno Manser Fonds — Investigation into IKEA and Romanian forests
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
A Bavarian shoe chain sold itself to a turnaround investor in January — insolvent by March
A niche shoe retailer bet on one supplier for its hardest sizes, with no fallback
Paprika's second bankruptcy — a fund restart that never solved the underlying problem
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.