Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2023

iHeartMedia aired 29,000 Pixel 4 testimonials — most hosts had never touched the phone

Feb 2023: the FTC and 7 states settled with Google and iHeartMedia for $9.4M — nearly 29,000 radio ads praised the Pixel 4 from hosts who'd never used one.

iHeartMedia · 2023-02

What happened

In 2019 and 2020 Google hired iHeartMedia — America's largest radio broadcaster — and 11 other radio networks to have personalities endorse the Pixel 4. Google supplied scripts detailing the hosts' own 'experiences' with the phone. In most cases the hosts were never given a Pixel 4, never owned one, and did not use one regularly. The ads ran in the first person anyway: 'It's my favorite phone camera out there, especially in low light, thanks to Night Sight mode.'

The FTC found that nearly 29,000 such deceptive first-person endorsements aired across ten major markets. On 9 February 2023 the Commission voted 4–0 to approve final consent orders barring Google and iHeartMedia from similar misrepresentations; separate judgments with seven states added $9.4 million in penalties. Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey put the standard plainly: 'Consumers expect radio advertisements to be truthful and transparent about products, not misleading with fake endorsements.'

The case extended endorsement law — an endorser must actually have used what they praise — from Instagram back to broadcast radio. Google said it took compliance seriously; iHeartMedia declined to comment. The scripts came from Google, but the broadcaster put them on air as its hosts' own experience, and shared the order and the fine.

Why it happened

  • Google wrote scripts describing 'experiences' the hosts never had — the ads were fabricated testimony, not scripted praise.
  • Endorsement rules require the endorser to actually use the product: 'my favorite phone camera' from someone who never held the phone is a material misrepresentation.
  • The broadcaster was not a passive conduit — iHeartMedia produced and aired the ads, so it shared the consent order and the penalties with the advertiser.
What it cost$9.4M with states; FTC consent ordercostly

The lesson

An endorsement implies experience — influencer rules apply to radio hosts too. If the endorser never used the product, the testimonial is a misrepresentation, for advertiser and broadcaster alike.

Aftermath

The consent orders bar both companies from similar misrepresentations, and the $9.4M state penalties made the case one of the largest endorsement-law settlements involving broadcast media. It is now cited whenever regulators apply disclosure and use rules to paid voices — podcasters, streamers, radio hosts.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →