Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2023

HomeAdvisor sold leads on quality it couldn't back and billed a 'free' subscription

2023: FTC ordered HomeAdvisor to pay up to $7.2M for overstating lead quality, unproven conversion rates and selling a 'free' $59.99 subscription.

HomeAdvisor · Angi · 2023-01

What happened

HomeAdvisor, the Angi-affiliated home-improvement marketplace, sold leads to service providers on claims about how good those leads were. The FTC said those claims were false: while HomeAdvisor represented that providers would receive leads matching the services they offered and their preferred area, many did not, and the company often quoted job-conversion rates far higher than it could substantiate.

The sales pressure reached into the subscription itself. HomeAdvisor's sales agents misrepresented that the optional one-month mHelpDesk subscription was free — it actually cost $59.99 a month and formed part of an annual membership package that generally ran $287.99 plus a per-lead fee.

In January 2023 the FTC ordered HomeAdvisor to pay up to $7.2 million in redress and to stop the practices. The order set up two funds: payments of up to $30 for providers hurt by the lead misrepresentations, and up to $59.99 for those told the first month of mHelpDesk was free. Marketing that overpromised the product to the people buying it ended up paying for the promises it could not keep.

Why it happened

  • The lead-quality and conversion claims were not backed by evidence.
  • Sales agents sold a paid subscription as if the first month were free.
  • The deception was aimed at the paying customers the company relied on.
What it costup to $7.2M in redresscostly

The lesson

When the claim you sell leads on cannot survive scrutiny, the deception targets the very people who pay you — overstating lead quality and hiding a fee cost HomeAdvisor up to $7.2 million.

Aftermath

The FTC's January 2023 order required HomeAdvisor to pay up to $7.2 million in redress across two funds and barred the deceptive lead marketing and the misrepresentation of the mHelpDesk subscription. The order followed an administrative complaint against the Denver-based, Angi-affiliated company.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →