Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025

Hims & Hers aired the first Super Bowl ad for knockoff weight-loss drugs

Hims & Hers ran the first Super Bowl ad for knockoff GLP-1 drugs. Senators demanded FDA action. Novo Nordisk cut ties. Shares fell 35%.

Hims & Hers Health

What happened

In February 2025, Hims & Hers aired 'Sick of the System' — a 60-second Super Bowl LIX commercial promoting compounded injectable semaglutide, a knockoff version of Ozempic and Wegovy. It was the first Super Bowl advertisement ever to promote GLP-1 weight-loss treatments. The ad framed the product as a solution to America's obesity epidemic.

Senators Dick Durbin and Roger Marshall sent a joint letter to the FDA urging enforcement action, criticising the ad for promoting compounded semaglutide 'without disclosing side-effect or risk information.' Public health experts and industry trade groups condemned the ad. On September 9, 2025, the FDA sent Hims & Hers a warning letter as part of a broader enforcement effort targeting over 100 drug advertisers, faulting claims that compounded products contained 'the same active ingredient' as FDA-approved drugs.

In June 2025, Novo Nordisk — maker of Wegovy — terminated its collaboration with Hims & Hers, citing 'deceptive promotion and selling of illegitimate, knockoff versions of Wegovy that put patient safety at risk.' Hims & Hers shares fell roughly 35%. Multiple securities class action lawsuits were filed in the Northern District of California.

Why it happened

  • The Super Bowl was the megaphone: buying the largest advertising platform in America to promote unapproved knockoff drugs guaranteed maximum scrutiny from regulators and competitors.
  • The risk disclosure was absent: the ad framed compounded semaglutide as a solution to obesity without mentioning side effects — the omission was the regulatory trigger.
  • The 'same active ingredient' claim was false: compounded semaglutide is not FDA-approved and the FDA warning letter confirmed the equivalence claim was misleading.
  • The Novo Nordisk termination was the consequence: the maker of the original drug publicly called the partnership partner deceptive — a corporate rebuke that was also a legal signal.
What it costShares -35%; Novo Nordisk cut; FDA warningembarrassing

The lesson

Buying a Super Bowl slot to promote unapproved knockoff drugs is a regulatory flare. When the FDA, two senators, and your pharma partner all move against you in the same year, the ad was the problem.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →