The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Technical decision · 2018
He Jiankui gene-edited two babies — and the scientific world condemned him
In 2018, He Jiankui announced he had CRISPR-edited twin girls DNA. The scientific community condemned it. He was prosecuted and the work shut down.
Southern University of Science and Technology · 2018-11
What happened
In November 2018, Chinese biophysicist He Jiankui announced at a summit in Hong Kong that he had used CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to modify the embryos of twin girls, Lulu and Nana, to make them resistant to HIV. It was the first known case of gene-edited human babies.
The global scientific community reacted with near-universal condemnation. The experiment was deemed medically unnecessary (the father was HIV-positive but standard prevention methods exist), ethically unjustified (the risks of off-target mutations were unknown), and scientifically premature. He had bypassed institutional review and informed consent protocols.
He Jiankui was fired from Southern University of Science and Technology, prosecuted for illegal medical practice, and fined 3 million yuan. The case prompted China to tighten its regulations on human gene editing and became the defining example of how a researcher's ambition can outrun ethics, with consequences for the subjects who cannot consent.
Why it happened
- He Jiankui edited human embryos without adequate scientific justification or ethical review.
- The experiment was medically unnecessary — standard HIV prevention methods exist.
- The risks of off-target CRISPR mutations were unknown and could affect the children for life.
- He bypassed institutional review and informed consent, violating research ethics protocols.
The lesson
Capability is not permission. He had CRISPR but not the justification to use it on babies who couldn't consent. They were subjects of an experiment nobody approved.
Aftermath
He Jiankui returned to public view in 2022. China tightened its gene-editing regulations. The case prompted the WHO to establish a global registry for human genome editing research. The ethical debate about germline editing continues.
Sources
- AP News — 'China convicts 3 researchers involved in gene-edited babies', 30 December 2019
- He Jiankui affair — Wikipedia
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Sigma-Tau raised an orphan drug 500x — regulators fined it €20.5M
Hydroxychloroquine champion Didier Raoult — 46 retractions, 218 concerns
Physicist faked room-temp superconductivity — 5 retractions, thesis 21% plagiarized
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.