The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 2022
Hangxiao Steel Structure lost $6M on futures — expected procurement hedge failed
Chinese steel structure maker lost $6M on raw material futures. The hedge was for 'expected procurement' that never happened. It secretly used reserve funds.
Hangxiao Steel Structure (杭萧钢构) · 2022-08-27
What happened
Hangxiao Steel Structure (stock code 600477.SH) is a Shanghai-listed Chinese steel structure engineering company, one of the largest in the industry. Its subsidiary WanJun LvJian operates a green building materials e-commerce platform.
In April 2022, the board approved a futures hedging programme with a maximum capital limit of 50 million yuan. The subsidiary began trading raw material futures — steel rebar, hot-rolled coils, and iron ore — to hedge against rising input costs. The strategy was 'expected procurement hedging', meaning the company was hedging against anticipated future purchases rather than existing physical inventory or firm purchase orders.
Between April and August 2022, raw material prices fell sharply amid China's property market slowdown and COVID lockdowns. The long futures positions lost money. By 24 August, cumulative losses reached 41.66 million yuan ($6 million), equivalent to 10.12% of 2021 audited net profit. The company had also secretly used 30 million yuan from a 'temporary risk reserve' to add margin — a violation of its own disclosed fund limits.
The Shanghai Stock Exchange sent a regulatory work letter on 29 August 2022. The board publicly apologised and implemented new controls: adding professional risk management staff, setting a hard stop-loss trigger (any single position losing 50% of its capital must be escalated to the board), and revising the hedging policy to require matching positions against actual procurement orders. The case became a textbook example of 'expected transaction hedging' — a strategy that looks like risk management but is indistinguishable from speculation when the expected purchases never materialise.
Why it happened
- Hangxiao hedged against 'expected procurement' rather than actual inventory or firm orders — when prices fell, there was no physical position to offset the futures losses.
- The company secretly used 30 million yuan in reserve funds to add margin, violating its own disclosed capital limits and misleading investors about its risk exposure.
- The hedging team lacked experience with financial derivatives and failed to adjust positions when the market turned sharply against them.
The lesson
A hedge against 'expected procurement' is not a hedge — it is a long position in futures with a story attached. When the expected purchase never happens, the loss has no offset.
Sources
- Sina Finance — 杭萧钢构期货套保亏损4166万收监管函, 27 Sep 2022 (detailed breakdown of the loss, SSE regulatory letter, board response)
- Toutiao — 杭萧钢构连续两年增收不增利 做多期货亏4000万元, 2022 (loss breakdown, stock impact)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Mitsubishi's China copper trader dealt with friends — and lost ¥13.8B
Nanshan Power bet Goldman Sachs on oil — and lost the company
Zhuzhou Smelter shorted 420K tonnes of zinc — $176M loss nearly bankrupted the company
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.