Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2009–2013

Gucci sued Guess over the letter G — Milan cancelled Gucci's own trademarks

2009: Gucci sued Guess in New York and Milan over G logos; NY awarded $4.7m of the $221m sought, then cut to $456k; in Milan Gucci lost it all.

Gucci · Guess · 2013-05

What happened

In 2009 Gucci sued Guess on two continents at once — New York and Milan — alleging trademark infringement, counterfeiting and unfair competition over Guess's use of the letter G, including its 'Quattro G' logo. In the United States Gucci sought $221 million. Guess co-chairman and co-chief executive Paul Marciano would describe the campaign as 'forum shopping all over the world to try and stop Guess from expanding its successful accessories business' — three years of litigation in New York, four in Milan.

The New York case closed in 2012 as a technical Gucci win and a practical one for Guess: of the $221 million sought, the court awarded $4.7 million — later reduced to $456,183. Less than a quarter of one per cent of the claim survived the trial.

Then came the home defeat. In May 2013 the Milan court rejected every Gucci claim, and went further: it cancelled Gucci's Italian trademarks for the diamond pattern, the G logo and the Flora pattern, holding that the single-G stamp was common in fashion and that Guess's Quattro G already had 'remarkable notoriety' of its own. Marciano called Gucci's tactics 'nothing less than bullying,' adding the fight 'should have been easily resolved with a simple phone call, which Gucci never made.' Gucci called the decision 'extremely incorrect' — 'parasitic free-riding' — and said it would appeal.

Why it happened

  • $221 million sought, $456,183 awarded in New York — the scale of the claim became the story of its own failure.
  • The Milan court did not just reject Gucci's case; it cancelled the Italian trademarks behind it — the suit cost the claimant part of its own portfolio.
  • Seven years across two courts over a letter both brands used; Marciano's 'simple phone call' line framed the whole campaign as choice, not necessity.
What it cost$456k of $221m sought; own trademarks cancelled in Milancostly

The lesson

A trademark campaign fought in every court at once can lose in every court at once — Gucci's seven-year suit over the letter G ended with its own Italian registrations cancelled.

Aftermath

Gucci appealed the Milan ruling and the litigation ran on; the New York award stood as the case's final arithmetic — $456,183 against a $221 million claim. The dispute became fashion law's standard example of over-enforcement against a competitor's parallel use of a common motif.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →