Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2021

GS25's camping poster showed a hand pinching a sausage — Korea read a hidden insult

A pinching hand picking up a sausage led men to accuse GS25 of mocking them, echoing a feminist site's logo. GS25 pulled the poster and its CEO apologised.

GS25 · GS Retail · 2021-05

What happened

On 1 May 2021, GS25, South Korea's largest convenience-store chain, posted its first promotional poster for a line of camping goods on social media, planning to run it for a month. The drawing showed a hand picking up a Vienna sausage with a pinching gesture, thumb and forefinger close together. Within a day, customers on men's online communities said the gesture copied the logo of Megalia, a radical feminist site that had shut in 2017, and was meant to mock the size of male genitalia.

The reading spread, and the sausage only fed it. Critics then argued that the poster's English tagline, 'Emotional Camping Must-have Item,' hid the Korean slang for Megalia if its last letters were read backwards. GS25 scrubbed the disputed images and posted a revised version — but the new image of a moon and three stars was itself read as a feminist symbol, this time of a Seoul National University group. Each fix produced a fresh accusation.

GS25 removed the moon and stars, then took the poster down altogether, and launched an internal probe. Its chief executive, Cho Yoon-sung, later apologised and promised measures to stop it happening again. The episode also drew the opposite complaint: women's online communities accused the chain of caving to male pressure. A camping-goods promotion had become a proxy for the country's wider argument over gender, and the brand could not satisfy either side.

Why it happened

  • An innocent-looking drawing landed in the middle of an intense, pre-existing culture war, where a primed audience was already scanning brand imagery for hidden signals.
  • Each attempt to fix the poster added a new element that critics read as another signal, so the response kept feeding the controversy instead of closing it.
  • The brand had no neutral ground: apologising to one side looked like capitulation to the other, in a debate that was never really about a sausage.
What it costposter pulled; CEO apology; internal probeembarrassing

The lesson

In a charged culture war, the audience supplies the meaning. A drawing that looks neutral to you can be read as a signal by a group already looking for one — and each fix becomes material to decode.

Aftermath

The GS25 case became the reference point for a wave of similar 'hidden gesture' disputes in South Korea, with other brands and public posters scrutinised for the same pinching hand. The designer said she had not known the gesture could be read as a feminist symbol. For marketers, the lasting lesson was less about any one image than about operating in an environment where an organised audience treats brand imagery as a code to be cracked — and where the speed of removal matters more than the quality of the explanation.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →