Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025

Yeferson Cossio sold a course on getting rich like him — SIC called it misleading

April 2025: Colombia's SIC fined Grupo Cossio COP 813M — the 'Método Cossio' course promised followers wealth in five months, and 23,000 bought the dream.

Grupo Cossio · 2025-04

What happened

Yeferson Cossio, a Colombian influencer with more than 12 million Instagram followers, sold 'Método Cossio', a digital course of some 100 hours on editing, photography and monetisation, marketed as his personal formula for wealth. The promotion promised fast results: buyers were told they could pay off the purchase 'with their first video', and '¿Qué van a pensar ustedes ya en cinco meses cuando todos los que sí compraron el curso estén tapados en seguidores, en plata?' Priced at more than a million pesos, later cut to 250,000, it became a bestseller on the Hotmart platform.

Colombia's SIC found the advertising misleading: it presented Cossio's personal success as objectively replicable for buyers. The promises were not commercial exaggeration, the regulator said, but objective affirmations that induced error by trading on trust in a public figure. In Resolution 20777 of 15 April 2025, the SIC confirmed a fine of $813,002,240 pesos against Grupo Cossio S.A.S., finding that more than 23,000 consumers bought the course under false expectations.

Cossio, who had said earlier that if the SIC ruled he broke the rules he would pay and 'se acata la ley', had not issued a statement when the decision landed. The case became Colombia's reference point for influencer advertising: a celebrity's biography is not a product specification, and outcomes sold as replicable need evidence behind them.

Why it happened

  • The course sold the influencer's own biography as proof: Cossio's wealth was presented as a method buyers could repeat, not luck or an outlier's story.
  • 'Pay it off with your first video' is a performance claim — the kind regulators treat as objective affirmations — and it was made with no evidence of typical results.
  • Trust in a public figure was the sales mechanism, and the SIC treated the exploitation of that trust as the reason the claims induced error.
What it costCOP 813M fine on company and influencercostly

The lesson

An influencer's success story is not a product spec. When a course sells outcomes as replicable, regulators demand evidence of typical results — and fine when there is none.

Aftermath

The sanction became the Colombian benchmark for influencer-driven advertising and entered the regional debate over where creator commerce crosses from promotion into deception. Cossio kept creating content; the ruling stood as the price of selling a biography as a method.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →