Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Strategic decision · 2017

Google demoted rival shopping services and paid €2.42B for the privilege

Google placed its own shopping results above rivals’ in search for a decade. The EC fined it €2.42B, and the General Court upheld the decision in 2021.

Google (Alphabet) · 2017-06-27

What happened

Google had built the world’s most-used search engine, and by the late 2000s it faced a problem: its own comparison shopping service was losing to established rivals such as Kelkoo, PriceRunner and Foundem. Rather than improve the product, Google began positioning its own shopping results more prominently in general search results while systematically demoting rival comparison shopping services to lower positions. The practice began in Germany and the UK around 2008 and later expanded to 13 European Economic Area countries.

The European Commission investigated after complaints from Foundem (a UK price comparison site) and Kelkoo. In June 2017, the Commission ruled that Google had abused its market dominance in general internet search by giving illegal advantage to its own comparison shopping service. The Commission fined Google a record €2.42 billion (£2.1B; $2.7B) and ordered it to stop the conduct within 90 days or face penalty payments of up to 5% of Alphabet’s average daily worldwide turnover.

Google appealed to the General Court of the European Union. In November 2021, the General Court largely upheld the Commission’s decision, rejecting most of Google’s arguments (though it partially annulled the finding for 13 specific national markets on the grounds of insufficient evidence of market conditions). The fine was confirmed. Google further appealed to the European Court of Justice, where the case remained pending. The ruling established that self-preferencing by a dominant search engine can constitute an abuse of market power.

Why it happened

  • Google chose to use its dominance in general search to protect its struggling comparison shopping service rather than compete on the merits.
  • The company systematically demoted rival shopping services to lower positions in search results while placing its own results at the top, knowing competitors could not replicate this advantage.
  • Google treated the competition law risk as an acceptable cost, continuing the practice for nearly a decade before the EC intervened.
  • The company’s internal documents and algorithms were designed to privilege its own service regardless of relevance, which the Commission found to be an intentional strategy rather than a design flaw.
What it cost€2.42B fine; forced to treat rivals equallycostly

The lesson

When a dominant platform uses its control of access to tilt the playing field toward its own services, regulators will eventually level it — and the bill will include the years you spent doing it.

Aftermath

Google was required to apply the same treatment to rival comparison shopping services as to its own. The case set a landmark precedent that self-preferencing by a dominant search engine can breach EU competition law. It was the first of three major EC antitrust fines against Google, followed by the €4.34 billion Android fine (2018) and the €1.49 billion AdSense fine (2019). The ruling also influenced the development of the Digital Markets Act (DMA), which codified prohibitions on self-preferencing for designated gatekeeper platforms.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →