The encyclopedia · Software & IT · Product decision · 2011–2019
Google+ had 5.4B users on paper — but 90% of sessions lasted under 5 seconds
Google forced Google+ onto every Android user and claimed 5.4B 'users,' but almost nobody actually used it. Two data leaks in 2018 ended the charade.
Google · Alphabet Inc. · 2019-04-02
What happened
Google+ launched on June 28, 2011, as Google's answer to Facebook. It was an aggressive product: YouTube comments required a Google+ account, Gmail contacts became Google+ circles, search results showed Google+ posts. The strategy inflated user count to 5.4 billion 'monthly active users' by 2013 — but this counted anyone signed into any Google service. The real number of people actually posting and sharing was a fraction of that. A 2011 study found the average user spent 3.3 minutes per month on Google+. Facebook users spent 7.5 hours.
Google+ had a fundamental design problem: it was engineered from Google's data perspective, not from a user's social perspective. Circles were too complicated. The stream was always empty unless you spent hours curating. There was no viral loop — nothing that made users want to post or return. By 2015, Google+ was a ghost town with expensive servers. A 2018 internal memo revealed that 90% of user sessions lasted less than five seconds. The product existed because Google was too proud to kill it.
The end came from a security crisis. In October 2018, Google disclosed an API bug that exposed 525,000 users' private data. Then in December 2018, Google revealed a second bug that exposed 52.5 million users' data for six days. Google had known about the first bug since March 2018 but had kept it secret to avoid regulatory attention. The disclosure forced Google's hand: it shut down consumer Google+ on April 2, 2019. The project that had cost hundreds of millions and consumed Google's social ambitions for eight years ended with a quiet server shutdown that almost nobody noticed.
Why it happened
- Google inflated user count to 5.4B by counting anyone signed into any Google service. Real engagement was near zero — average session was 3.3 minutes monthly; 90% lasted under 5 seconds.
- Google forced Google+ onto every product — YouTube comments, Gmail, search — making it impossible for users to escape. The 'users' were captives, not a community.
- Google knew about the first API data leak since March 2018 but hid it for seven months to avoid regulatory attention. When the second leak hit 52.5M users, the cover-up collapsed.
- Google+ finally shut down on April 2, 2019. A project that had hundreds of millions in investment and eight years of effort ended with a server shutdown that almost nobody noticed or cared about.
The lesson
You cannot force users to be a community by integrating your product into everything they use. If nobody actually wants to use it, the biggest user count in the world is just a number.
Aftermath
Google+ shut down on April 2, 2019. The data leaks triggered a $22.5 million FTC penalty for Google. The shutdown freed YouTube and other products from forced Google+ integration — a change users had wanted for years. Google+ survived as an enterprise product (Google Currents) until 2023. The failure ended Google's social networking ambitions. Google+'s collapse became a cautionary tale about vanity metrics: a product can have billions of 'users' and still be a failure if none of them actually use it.
Sources
- Wikipedia — Google+ (launched June 28, 2011; 5.4B 'MAU' counted all Google services; 90% of sessions under 5 seconds; two API data leaks in 2018; shut down April 2, 2019)
- The Wall Street Journal — 'Google Exposed User Data, Feared Fallout of Revealing to Public' (Google knew about API bug March 2018; hid it for 7 months; second leak hit 52.5M users in December 2018; $22.5M FTC fine)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
A software change took Verizon's 5G core down 10 hrs — 2M lost calling, texting and 911
Meta's 'designed for privacy' glasses shipped users' intimate footage to Kenya reviewers
Microsoft 365 falls for five hours after a maintenance bug cut West US off the network
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.