The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2012
Goldman Sachs helped raise billions for 1MDB — and paid $2.9B for its role in the fraud
Goldman bankers arranged $6.5B in bonds for Malaysia's 1MDB fund, much of it stolen. The DOJ called it the largest kleptocracy case; Goldman paid $2.9B.
Goldman Sachs · 1MDB · 2012-05
What happened
1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) was a Malaysian state investment fund set up in 2009 under then-Prime Minister Najib Razak. Over the following years, more than $4.5 billion was siphoned out of it, according to the US Department of Justice — the largest kleptocracy case it had ever pursued. Central to moving the money were bond deals arranged by Goldman Sachs, whose bankers helped 1MDB raise about $6.5 billion in 2012 and 2013.
Goldman collected roughly $600 million in fees for the deals — an extraordinary sum. But much of the money raised was diverted, through shell companies and offshore accounts orchestrated by the fugitive financier Jho Low, into the pockets of officials and their associates, including hundreds of millions that flowed to Najib himself. Goldman's own bankers, notably Tim Leissner and Roger Ng, were later accused of knowing about and facilitating the scheme while assuring the bank's compliance systems that all was well.
When the scandal broke, it triggered investigations worldwide. Leissner pleaded guilty in the US to money-laundering and bribery charges and forfeited $43.7 million; Roger Ng was convicted and imprisoned. Malaysia charged Goldman's subsidiaries and sought billions in fines. In 2020, Goldman agreed to pay roughly $2.9 billion to settle the investigations — the largest penalty ever under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The scandal helped bring down Najib's government and remains a byword for how a global bank can be used to launder stolen public money.
Why it happened
- Goldman's bankers arranged billions in bond deals for 1MDB and collected huge fees while red flags about the fund and Jho Low mounted.
- Senior bankers (Leissner, Ng) allegedly knew about and facilitated the diversion of funds while misleading the bank's own compliance controls.
- The enormous fees created a powerful incentive to overlook due-diligence concerns about a politically connected client.
- Weak internal controls and the desire to win lucrative emerging-market business let the scheme proceed.
The lesson
When fees are huge and the client is powerful, the incentive to look away is strong. Goldman arranged billions for 1MDB while red flags mounted, collecting $600M in fees.
Aftermath
The 1MDB scandal is a landmark case of how a major global bank can become an instrument of grand corruption, and of gatekeeping's failure when fees and powerful clients are involved. It led to one of the largest financial penalties in history ($2.9 billion for Goldman), the imprisonment of bankers, the fall of a Malaysian government, and lasting damage to its reputation. The lesson: compliance and due diligence are not obstacles to business — they are the business. When those arranging deals bypass the controls, the institution becomes the conduit for fraud, and the reckoning is enormous.
Sources
- 1Malaysia Development Berhad scandal — Wikipedia ($4.5B diverted, Goldman's role, $2.9B settlement)
- SEC press release 2020-265, 22 October 2020 — SEC Charges Goldman Sachs With FCPA Violations (agreed to pay more than $2.9B; underwrote ~$6.5B in 1MDB bond offerings)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
WorldCom hid $3.8B in expenses to fake profits — the biggest US fraud of its era
Enron hid debt in hundreds of shell companies to look profitable — then imploded
FLC Group inflated a subsidiary's capital 2,900x and listed it on Vietnam's stock exchange
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.