The encyclopedia · Software & IT · Financial decision · 1997–2002
Global Crossing linked 200 cities with fiber — then went bankrupt owing $12.5B
Global Crossing built a fiber-optic network linking 200+ cities in 27 countries, betting demand would follow. It didn't, and the company went bankrupt in 2002.
Global Crossing · 2002-01
What happened
Global Crossing was the boldest bet of the telecom boom. Founded in 1997, it set out to build a private global fiber-optic network, and within a few years it had laid cable linking more than 200 major cities in 27 countries, including a great deal of fiber under the North Atlantic. At the height of the dot-com frenzy its shares soared, and it looked like the company that would own the internet's plumbing.
The business was built on an assumption: that demand for bandwidth would keep exploding. It did not. When the dot-com bubble burst, the big customers who were supposed to fill the network disappeared, and the industry was left with far more fiber than there was traffic to carry. As one analyst put it, everyone had overestimated the demand — there was a lot of supply chasing too little revenue, and prices were falling.
Global Crossing was never profitable. On 28 January 2002 it filed for bankruptcy with about $12.5 billion of debt — at the time the largest telecom bankruptcy in US history. Regulators later looked into whether the company had artificially inflated its revenues, and the SEC and FBI opened investigations; the lesson, as Wharton's analysis put it, was that accounting which tries to cover up bad business only sinks the company faster.
Global Crossing is the textbook case of building ahead of demand on borrowed money. The network was real and impressive; the customers were not. When a business is built on the assumption that the market will grow into its capacity, and the market doesn't, the debt has no revenue to meet it — however good the asset looks on paper.
Why it happened
- Global Crossing built a global fiber-optic network across 200+ cities in 27 countries on the assumption that demand for bandwidth would keep exploding.
- When the dot-com bubble burst, the large customers who were meant to fill the network disappeared, leaving the industry with far more fiber than traffic.
- The company was never profitable — too much supply chasing too little revenue, with prices falling — and it carried about $12.5 billion of debt.
- On 28 January 2002 it filed for bankruptcy, then the largest telecom bankruptcy in US history, amid SEC and FBI probes into possible artificial inflation of revenue.
The lesson
Build it and they will come is not a business plan. Global Crossing laid fiber across the world assuming demand would catch up; when it didn't, $12.5B of debt had no revenue behind it.
Aftermath
Global Crossing emerged from bankruptcy under new ownership and its network continued to operate, eventually changing hands again — the fiber was valuable, just not at the price the boom had put on it. The collapse, alongside WorldCom and others, defined the telecom bust of the early 2000s and became a standing warning about infrastructure built on demand forecasts rather than demand, and about the accounting that companies reach for when the forecasts fail.
Sources
- Knowledge@Wharton — 'Factors Behind Global Crossing's Failure', 13 February 2002 (filed for bankruptcy 28 January 2002 with $12.5 billion in debt; fiber network across 200+ cities in 27 countries; overestimated demand; SEC and FBI revenue-inflation probes)
- Los Angeles Times — 'Global Crossing Files for Chapter 11', 29 January 2002 (Chapter 11 under more than $12 billion in debt; the undersea communications network)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
EchoStar borrowed billions to build a 5G network. It sold the spectrum and went bankrupt.
Qwest grew through a $48B merger, then accounting fraud and insider trading destroyed it
WorldCom hid $3.8B in expenses to fake profits — the biggest US fraud of its era
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.