Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2019

Gillette's 'The Best Men Can Be' ad took on toxic masculinity — and the audience revolted

Gillette reworked its 30-year slogan in 2019 to confront toxic masculinity. The ad meant to flatter modern men instead drew boycott calls and mass dislike.

Gillette · Procter & Gamble · 2019-01

What happened

On 13 January 2019 Gillette released a short film, 'We Believe: The Best Men Can Be.' It opened by questioning the slogan the brand had used since 1989 — 'The Best a Man Can Get' — asking 'is this the best a man can get?' It then showed scenes of boys bullying one another and men behaving badly, before ending on a more hopeful note and reworking the slogan to 'The Best Men Can Be.' The message was that the boys watching today would be the men of tomorrow.

The reaction split immediately and loudly. Many viewers praised the message; many others read it as an attack on men. The film became one of the most-disliked videos on YouTube, and calls spread to boycott Gillette and its parent, Procter & Gamble. The debate was less about razors than about who the brand thought its customer was.

Procter & Gamble stood by the campaign, saying it was proud of the film. The episode became a textbook case of a brand stepping into a culture war: the customers who already agreed with the message did not need convincing, and the ones who did not blamed the product. The argument was never really about razors — it was about who the brand believed its customer was, and a large share of them felt lectured rather than flattered.

Why it happened

  • The ad reframed a 30-year slogan as a critique of the men who had bought it, so loyal customers heard an insult rather than a compliment.
  • A razor is a low-involvement purchase; buyers did not want the product to carry a position they had not chosen.
  • The campaign read as taking one side in a culture war, which turned the brand into a proxy for an argument customers were already having.
What it costboycott calls; among YouTube's most-disliked adsembarrassing

The lesson

When a brand takes a side in a culture war, the product becomes a proxy for the argument. The customers who agree were never leaving; the ones who disagree now have a reason to switch.

Aftermath

Procter & Gamble kept the campaign up and defended it publicly. 'The Best Men Can Be' won advertising awards for its ambition even as it remained one of the platform's most-disliked videos. The case is now a standard reference for the risk of brand activism: a company can hold a genuine position and still lose customers by attaching it to a product they buy without thinking about politics.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →