The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2024–2025
Fuji TV's closed-door press conference cost it 300 advertisers in ten days
December 2024: misconduct allegations surface. January 17: a press conference that barred cameras and foreign media. January 27: president and chairman gone.
Fuji Television · 2025-01-17
What happened
In December 2024, Japanese weekly magazines reported allegations of misconduct involving a former television star and a Fuji Television employee, and questions about how the broadcaster had handled the matter. Fuji TV's response, on 17 January 2025, became a bigger story than the scandal: a closed-door press conference that barred weekly magazines, online outlets and foreign media, allowed no live broadcast, and restricted what attendees could publish. Commentators called it a 'picture-story show'.
The advertisers answered immediately. About 40 sponsors had halted advertising by 20 January; between 18 and 20 January, more than 350 commercials were pulled and replaced. By 22 January, 75 companies had withdrawn advertisements; by 25 January, over 120; by the end of the month, 311 companies and organizations had replaced their Fuji TV commercials with public-service announcements. By late February, only 72 companies were still sponsoring the network.
The resignations followed the advertisers, not the other way around: president Koichi Minato and chairman Shuji Kano stepped down on 27 January; veteran powerbroker Hisashi Hieda left his advisory role in February and his board seat by June. A third-party committee reported on 31 March. Fuji Media Holdings' stock fell 13% in three weeks. The case is a textbook in crisis escalation: the misconduct was the spark, but the closed-door press conference was the accelerant — it converted a scandal about one incident into an indictment of the company's culture, and the advertisers priced that in.
Why it happened
- A closed-door press conference signals that the company fears scrutiny more than it respects the public — advertisers read the signal the same day the journalists did.
- Television's revenue is a confidence market: sponsors buy adjacency to a trusted brand, and 350 pulled commercials in a weekend is a bank run on that trust.
- Resigning after the advertisers leave is the most expensive possible sequence — the departures read as concessions extracted by revenue loss, not as accountability.
The lesson
In a crisis the second story is always the response — a closed door tells the market the company is managing the story, not the problem; advertisers, who buy trust by the spot, sell first.
Sources
- Resignations of Fuji Television execs fail to win back advertisers
- Fuji TV hit by massive ad boycott, top executives resign over scandal
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
DAZN's ¥980 World Cup price hid a ¥26,340 annual contract — refunds followed
AKB48's first-ever contract termination cost Hanada Aoi her radio show in two days
TV Shin-Hiroshima billed four ramen shops as 'first in Hiroshima' — they weren't
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.