The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 1991–2025
Fuguiniao was China's No. 3 shoe brand — then its founder bet everything on P2P lending
Fuguiniao went from a 40,000 yuan workshop to a billion-dollar HK IPO — then lost everything on P2P lending and mining that had nothing to do with shoes.
Fuguiniao (富贵鸟) · Fuguiniao Group · 2013-12-20
What happened
Fuguiniao started in 1991 when four brothers pooled 40,000 yuan to take over a failing state-owned factory in Shishi, Fujian. They built it into one of China's most recognized shoe brands, specializing in affordable leather shoes. By 2013, Fuguiniao was China's third-largest business casual shoe manufacturer, with over 2,000 stores and annual revenue exceeding 500 million yuan.
The company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in 2013 with a market valuation exceeding HK$10 billion. But instead of investing in its core business, management began diversifying into P2P lending platforms, small-business lending at high interest rates, and mining projects. By 2015, non-core financial investments dominated the balance sheet.
The P2P lending crash of 2016–2018 devastated the company. Borrowers defaulted, platforms collapsed, and Fuguiniao was left with massive bad debts. The stock was suspended in September 2016. By 2017, it had swung from profit to a net loss of 10.9 million yuan on revenue of 412 million yuan. A company bond rated AA collapsed by 90% within two days of resuming trading in March 2018.
In August 2019, a Fujian court ordered the company into bankruptcy restructuring. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange cancelled Fuguiniao's listing in November 2019. On November 21, 2025, the company was formally dissolved.
Why it happened
- Fuguiniao's management abandoned its core shoe business to chase P2P lending and mining investments — industries the founders had no expertise in
- The P2P lending crash of 2016–2018 wiped out the company's cash reserves as borrowers defaulted and platforms collapsed
- A once-profitable manufacturer of 2,000+ stores was brought down not by competition but by bad bets on businesses it never understood
The lesson
Fuguiniao was not killed by competition. It was killed by the belief that a shoe company could make money faster in lending and mining than in making shoes. The founders lost it before the crash.
Sources
- Wikipedia — 富贵鸟 (Chinese)
- 网易财经 — 投资P2P后"鞋王"破产退市 (Nov 2019; suspended Sep 2016, bankrupt Aug 2019, HKEX delisting Nov 2019)
- 网易号 — 富贵鸟:百亿市值灰飞烟灭 (Dec 2025 retrospective: HK$10B day-one cap, 2015 P2P investment, collapse timeline)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Knocked back ten years: Pou Sheng's Nike and Adidas trap
Reebok China lost for 3 years — stores vanished, operator replaced
Lane Crawford spent ¥300M on a Chengdu flagship — closed eleven years later
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.