The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 1994–1995
Fidelity's missing minus sign made a $1.3B loss look like a $2.4B dividend
An accountant transcribed a $1.3B capital loss as a gain, causing Fidelity to announce a $4.32/share distribution that never existed.
Fidelity Investments · 1994-12
What happened
In November 1994, Fidelity Investments estimated that its Magellan Fund, the world's largest mutual fund with 3 million shareholders, would distribute $4.32 per share to investors as a year-end capital gains payment — roughly $2.4 billion in total. Days later, Fidelity revised that estimate to zero. The company initially would only call it a 'manual mathematical error' and refused to provide details.
In January 1995, Fidelity explained what happened. An accountant, while transcribing the fund's net gains and losses onto a spreadsheet used to calculate distributions, mistakenly transcribed a $1.3 billion capital loss as a capital gain of the same amount. The missing minus sign turned a loss into a gain, and the error cascaded through the distribution calculation. J. Gary Burkhead, managing director of Fidelity, disclosed the explanation in a letter to shareholders.
The error caused confusion and concern among investors and tax professionals. The fund had already distributed $2.64 per share in May 1994, and the November estimate was meant to help shareholders plan their tax liabilities. Fidelity stated the mistake did not affect the value of customer investments or the fund's performance. The Magellan Fund was down roughly 3.7% for the year, its worst since 1990, but the error itself cost no direct money — it was a reputational failure and a scramble to correct a public promise.
Why it happened
- An accountant transcribed a $1.3B loss as a gain by omitting a minus sign on a spreadsheet, and the error was not caught before Fidelity publicly announced the $2.4B distribution.
- Fidelity had no verification step between the spreadsheet calculation and the public announcement — a single transcription error cascaded into a $4.32/share promise affecting 3 million shareholders.
- The company had made a similar error in June 1994 when it published incorrect prices for its funds, suggesting systemic weaknesses in the review process.
The lesson
A missing minus sign on a spreadsheet created a $2.4B phantom promise. Review every calculation that becomes a public number — it is the only thing between a clerical error and a national story.
Sources
- Doubts Raised by Fidelity Accounting Error — New York Times (Dec 7, 1994)
- Magellan Error Is Explained — New York Times (Jan 4, 1995)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
International Paper wrote off $2.47B of DS Smith goodwill a year after buying it
Smucker wrote its Hostess goodwill down to zero within two years of the $5.6B deal
Forward Air wrote down $1B of its $2.1B Omni acquisition a year after closing it
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.