Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Strategic decision · 1993

Fialuridine looked safe in animals — 5 of 15 patients died, 2 needed transplants

A hepatitis B drug passed animal tests but caused delayed liver failure in humans — 5 dead, 2 transplanted, and the FDA said it could not have been predicted.

Oclassen Pharmaceuticals · Eli Lilly and Company · 1993-10

What happened

Fialuridine (FIAU) was a nucleoside analogue developed by Oclassen Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly as a treatment for chronic hepatitis B. Preclinical testing in mice, rats, dogs, and monkeys showed no significant toxicity. The drug was approved for a Phase II trial in 1993, with 24 patients enrolled for a six-month course. The first nine weeks showed promising results — viral levels dropped and no serious side effects were observed.

After approximately 13 weeks of treatment, patients began developing severe symptoms: lactic acidosis, liver failure, pancreatitis, and peripheral neuropathy. Of the 15 patients who had completed or were still on treatment, 7 developed hepatic failure. Five died from acute liver failure, and two others were saved only by emergency liver transplants. The toxicity was delayed, cumulative, and catastrophic — once symptoms appeared, the damage was irreversible.

An FDA investigation concluded that the adverse effects could not have been predicted from animal studies or earlier Phase I data. The cause was species-selective mitochondrial toxicity: humans have a nucleoside transporter (hENT-1) that concentrates FIAU inside mitochondria, while other species do not. The drug was never marketed. The FIAU disaster became a landmark case in drug safety, permanently changing how mitochondrial toxicity is evaluated in preclinical drug development.

Why it happened

  • Animal models failed to predict toxicity — humans have a transporter (hENT-1) that concentrates FIAU in cells, while other species lack it, making the drug seem safe in every animal test.
  • The toxicity was delayed and cumulative — symptoms appeared after 13 weeks, long after the initial safety window had passed, so standard Phase I monitoring did not catch it.
  • Eli Lilly and Oclassen had no stop point or trigger for the delayed toxicity they did not know existed — the trial design assumed safety in animals meant safety in humans.
What it cost5 dead, 2 transplanted, drug abandoned, landmark FDA casecatastrophic

The lesson

A drug that looks safe in every animal species may still be lethal in humans, and a toxicity that takes 13 weeks to appear will not be caught by a six-week safety study.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →