The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 1999–2013
Elpida merged Japan's DRAM giants — then lost ¥448B in a commodity collapse
Japan merged its three DRAM makers into one national champion, but a commodity price collapse and the strong yen destroyed it.
Elpida Memory · NEC · Hitachi · Mitsubishi Electric · Micron Technology · 2012-02-27
What happened
Elpida Memory was created in 1999 as NEC Hitachi Memory, a merger of NEC's and Hitachi's DRAM businesses, and later absorbed Mitsubishi Electric's DRAM operations. The Japanese government and the country's largest banks backed the consolidation to create a national champion that could compete with Samsung and SK Hynix in the global DRAM market. Elpida became the world's third-largest DRAM maker with 18% market share.
The business model depended on DRAM as a commodity where price moved in cycles and Asian competitors could produce at lower cost. A perfect storm hit in 2011: the benchmark DDR3 2-gigabit price fell 85%, the Japanese yen strengthened against the dollar, PC demand stagnated, and Thai floods disrupted HDD supply chains. Elpida had already consumed ¥140 billion in government loans and emergency aid from 2009 and could not survive another downturn.
Elpida filed for bankruptcy on 27 February 2012 with ¥448 billion ($5.5 billion) in liabilities — the largest Japanese bankruptcy since Japan Airlines in 2010. The company was delisted in March 2012 and acquired by Micron Technology in July 2013. Micron invested $2 billion in the Hiroshima plant post-acquisition and later received $4.5 billion in Japanese government subsidies to keep the fab running.
Why it happened
- DRAM is a commodity where price is set by the global market, and the Japanese yen's strength made Elpida's production costs uncompetitive against Korean rivals Samsung and SK Hynix.
- The government-backed consolidation created a single national champion but did not address the structural cost disadvantage, leaving the company vulnerable to the next price cycle.
- Elpida was undercapitalised and relied on government loans and aid, meaning it had no financial buffer when the DRAM price collapsed 85% in a single year.
The lesson
Merging three uncompetitive companies does not make one competitive one. It makes one larger uncompetitive company that fails more spectacularly.
Sources
- Wikipedia — Elpida Memory
- AnandTech — Elpida Memory Files for Bankruptcy
- The Register — Elpida Memory files for bankruptcy
- TechPowerUp — Elpida Memory Files for Bankruptcy
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Panasonic lost ¥765B and cut 40,000 jobs — then rebuilt itself as a battery company
Japan merged Sony, Toshiba and Hitachi's display units — and lost money every year since
Sharp lost ¥376B on LCDs — Foxconn bought control for $3.5B in 2016
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.