Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 1999–2013

Elpida merged Japan's DRAM giants — then lost ¥448B in a commodity collapse

Japan merged its three DRAM makers into one national champion, but a commodity price collapse and the strong yen destroyed it.

Elpida Memory · NEC · Hitachi · Mitsubishi Electric · Micron Technology · 2012-02-27

What happened

Elpida Memory was created in 1999 as NEC Hitachi Memory, a merger of NEC's and Hitachi's DRAM businesses, and later absorbed Mitsubishi Electric's DRAM operations. The Japanese government and the country's largest banks backed the consolidation to create a national champion that could compete with Samsung and SK Hynix in the global DRAM market. Elpida became the world's third-largest DRAM maker with 18% market share.

The business model depended on DRAM as a commodity where price moved in cycles and Asian competitors could produce at lower cost. A perfect storm hit in 2011: the benchmark DDR3 2-gigabit price fell 85%, the Japanese yen strengthened against the dollar, PC demand stagnated, and Thai floods disrupted HDD supply chains. Elpida had already consumed ¥140 billion in government loans and emergency aid from 2009 and could not survive another downturn.

Elpida filed for bankruptcy on 27 February 2012 with ¥448 billion ($5.5 billion) in liabilities — the largest Japanese bankruptcy since Japan Airlines in 2010. The company was delisted in March 2012 and acquired by Micron Technology in July 2013. Micron invested $2 billion in the Hiroshima plant post-acquisition and later received $4.5 billion in Japanese government subsidies to keep the fab running.

Why it happened

  • DRAM is a commodity where price is set by the global market, and the Japanese yen's strength made Elpida's production costs uncompetitive against Korean rivals Samsung and SK Hynix.
  • The government-backed consolidation created a single national champion but did not address the structural cost disadvantage, leaving the company vulnerable to the next price cycle.
  • Elpida was undercapitalised and relied on government loans and aid, meaning it had no financial buffer when the DRAM price collapsed 85% in a single year.
What it cost¥448B debt; all equity lost; sold to Micron; 3,200 jobs gonecostly

The lesson

Merging three uncompetitive companies does not make one competitive one. It makes one larger uncompetitive company that fails more spectacularly.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →