Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · People & Management · People decision · 2026

Edie Parker's cannabis tee starred Amanda Batula, then romance news upstaged it

The brand launched a Batula-fronted campaign for a cannabis tee; hours later her romance broke, and Edie Parker rebuilt the ad with a new model.

Edie Parker · 2026-03-31

What happened

Edie Parker, a US cannabis-accessories brand, launched a campaign on the morning of 31 March 2026 fronted by Amanda Batula, a star of the reality series 'Summer House'. The campaign pushed a t-shirt reading 'These are your boobs on drugs', with 15% of sales going to the Last Prisoner Project, a group that works on cannabis-related criminal justice reform.

Hours later the campaign's premise was upended. Batula's secret romance with her co-star West Wilson was confirmed, and the personal news landed directly on top of the launch. The brand's choice of face suddenly read very differently to the audience it had aimed the charity angle at.

Edie Parker acted fast. It deleted the Batula posts and re-shot the campaign with a new model, keeping the same shirt and the same charity while swapping out the face, captioning the pivot 'Same shirt. Same great charity. New model.' Fans called the quick, honest change a smart save, but the episode had already cost the launch its clean first impression.

Why it happened

  • The brand picked a face whose personal life could upstage the message, and it did within hours
  • A celebrity-fronted charity campaign depends on the story around the face staying clean
  • The swift re-shoot saved the campaign but could not give it back its untarnished opening day
What it costa launch relaunched hours in with its original face goneembarrassing

The lesson

Edie Parker put a reality star's face on a charity tee and the personal news overtook the cause. A brand that borrows a celebrity's audience also borrows their news cycle.

Aftermath

Edie Parker replaced Batula with a new model on the same shirt and charity and kept the campaign running. The episode was a clean, if costly, pivot — the brand did not lose the campaign, but it lost the unbothered opening it had planned.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →