The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 2025
A Texas power fund returned 188% — then shrank to a tenth and closed
e360 Power's flagship energy fund closed in December 2025 after assets fell from about $400M to under $100M — its second wind-down in a decade.
e360 Power · 2025-12-31
What happened
e360 Power, a Texas energy-trading firm with fewer than ten employees, ran one of the hottest macro funds of the energy crisis years. Trading US natural gas and power markets, the flagship e360 Power Fund returned 188% in 2021 and 97% in 2022, and assets under management reached about $400 million by mid-2024.
Then the volatility that made the fund ran against it. Losses and investor redemptions — including the price shock that hit US energy markets after the April 2025 tariff announcements — drained the flagship to under $100 million, a base too small to justify operating costs. In December 2025 e360 closed the fund and moved the remaining capital into separately managed accounts under a lower-volatility strategy.
By mid-2026 the firm had raised fresh capital and reported gains of roughly 8–10% in the first five months of the year. It was the second flagship wind-down at e360 in less than a decade: the firm survives by restarting smaller, but the strategy that made its name no longer exists as a fund.
Why it happened
- The returns were built on energy volatility; when the same volatility arrived as losses, the strategy had no counterweight.
- A fund under half a billion dollars lives by performance: redemptions shrank the base below break-even and arithmetic finished it.
- Concentration in one macro theme means the fund's strategy and its risk are the same thing — there is no second engine.
The lesson
A volatility fund is only as durable as its investors' patience. The same price swings that print triple-digit returns can empty the fund in two seasons.
Sources
- Hedgeweek — e360 Power shifts to lower-risk strategy after flagship fund closure, Jun 2026
- Asset Management News — e360 Power shutters flagship fund, shifts to lower-risk trading, Jun 2026
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Amaranth Advisors lost $6.6B in a week — betting on natural gas futures with 10:1 leverage
Plains All American lost $162M on a rogue trader who forged the president's signature
Metallgesellschaft's hedge lost $1.3B — the hedge was worse than the risk
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.