Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025

DPPR's "midface shrinking" skincare claims mocked as false advertising

K-beauty brand DPPR claimed its serum could literally "shorten" a person's midface in four weeks; Korean forums called it a scam and the brand went quiet.

DPPR · 2025-09-05

What happened

DPPR (pronounced "dipper") launched its PDRNCUBE lineup in July 2025, anchored by the "PDRN Middle Shot 2000 Serum" and "PDRN Salmon Egg Cream." The brand's core promise was that the products would "shorten" a person's midface — the area from below the eyes to above the lips — following a viral new Korean beauty standard fixated on a smaller nose and philtrum.

The products attracted little attention at launch. That changed when a social media ad surfaced showing a long-faced dog plushie photoshopped to have a shorter midface, with the caption promising results "in just 4 weeks*" backed by a human clinical trial claimed to have measured midface lifting angle and length.

Korean beauty forums, led by theqoo, reacted with open ridicule. Commenters asked whether the serum would shrink their hands, reduce a double chin, or reshape bone structure that even medical professionals could not. The clinical trial's methods were questioned, and the brand was accused of preying on people insecure about their looks.

As of September 5, 2025, DPPR had not responded to the backlash. The controversy grew largely on word of mouth and forum threads rather than any formal regulatory action.

Why it happened

  • A topical serum and cream cannot shorten the distance between the eyes and lips, which is set by bone and soft tissue
  • A dog plushie photoshopped to suggest a shorter face is a visibly fake before-and-after, inviting trolling rather than belief
  • The brand leaned on a 22-participant lifting study while marketing a permanent structural change the trial could not support
  • Once mocked, DPPR stayed silent, letting ridicule define its launch
What it costViral launch became a laughingstock; the brand went silentembarrassing

The lesson

A claim that physics makes impossible will not sell on a clinical-trial footnote. If the before-and-after looks like a joke, the audience treats it as one, and silence confirms it.

Aftermath

The PDRNCUBE launch, meant to introduce a new premium K-beauty line, instead became a cautionary example of overreaching cosmetic claims. Forum ridicule spread across communities, and observers cited it as a low-water mark for the short-midface trend, already criticized for pushing an unrealistic standard. DPPR's silence left the controversy unresolved and defined the brand during its first months on sale at Musinsa Beauty.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →