Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2010

Dannon called Activia 'clinically proven' — the FTC made it pay $21M to 39 states

Dec 2010: Dannon paid $21M to 39 states — Activia was 'clinically proven' for digestion, DanActive 'strengthened defenses'. Neither was.

Dannon · 2010-12

What happened

Dannon sold yogurt as medicine-in-a-cup. Activia was 'clinically proven to help regulate your digestive system in two weeks'; DanActive was 'clinically proven to help strengthen your body's defenses' and help prevent colds and flu. Jamie Lee Curtis fronted the TV campaign, and the claims ran across television, packaging, the internet and print. Behind the promises, the FTC found, the science was not there.

On 15 December 2010 Dannon agreed to pay $21 million to settle parallel investigations by 39 state attorneys general, led by Oregon and Tennessee, and accepted an FTC consent order approved 5–0. The Commission charged that the 'clinically proven' claims were false: the probiotic evidence fell short, and cold-and-flu protection is a claim only an FDA-approved product may make. FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz: 'These types of misleading claims are enough to give consumers indigestion.'

The order rewrote the brand's language: no cold or flu claims without FDA approval, and any regularity claim had to say the benefit needs three daily servings, not one. Future violations cost $16,000 each. Dannon kept the products; it lost the claims that had sold them.

Why it happened

  • 'Clinically proven' was the campaign's whole engine — and the phrase regulators treat as a promise of evidence, not as puffery.
  • The ads sold one daily serving; the studies behind them required three — the gap between the claim and the evidence was itself the deception.
  • The FTC and 39 states moved in parallel, turning one ad campaign into a federal consent order and a $21M payment to the states.
What it cost$21M to 39 states; consent ordercostly

The lesson

'Clinically proven' is a promise of evidence, not a figure of speech. When an ad makes a health claim, the proof must match the claim as stated — dose included.

Aftermath

Activia and DanActive stayed on shelves, but the campaign that built them was gone; the three-a-day disclosure rewrote how probiotic foods could be marketed in the US. The settlement remains the standard citation for 'clinically proven' claims, invoked whenever food advertising reaches for medical language.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →