The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2024
Danish Crown's 'climate-controlled pig' label misled — and ended at the Supreme Court
A pink 'klimakontrolleret gris' sticker and 'pork is more climate-friendly than you think'. Denmark's first greenwashing lawsuit — lost at the Supreme Court.
Danish Crown · 2024-03-01
What happened
In 2020 Danish Crown, one of the world's largest pork processors, launched a nationwide campaign across TV, radio, newspapers and ad pillars: 'Grise er mere klimavenlige, end du tror' — pigs are more climate-friendly than you think. On packaging sat a round pink sticker: 'klimakontrolleret gris', climate-controlled pig. The claim rested on suppliers in Danish Crown's climate programme, who committed to reducing their CO2 footprint — with each producer free to decide how much.
In June 2021 Klimabevægelsen i Danmark and the Danish Vegetarian Association sued Danish Crown for misleading marketing — Denmark's first greenwashing lawsuit. Supermarkets had already removed the labelled meat from shelves; Danish Crown withdrew the campaign. On 1 March 2024 the Western High Court found the pink sticker misleading but acquitted the slogan, awarding the plaintiffs one of four claims and ordering Danish Crown to pay 300,000 kroner in costs. One participating producer told the court he could not document that his pigs were more climate-friendly than others.
The plaintiffs appealed, and before the Supreme Court Danish Crown formally accepted their claims. The resulting 2024 judgment went further than the high court's: Danish Crown had to acknowledge that the slogan 'Dansk gris er mere klimavenlig end du tror' also violated the Marketing Practices Act, was banned from using it for five years and from using 'klimakontrolleret' for the scheme in question, and had to publish the judgment's reasoning and result on its homepage for at least 14 days.
Why it happened
- The claim outran the evidence: producers set their own reduction targets, and one admitted he could not document that his pigs were climate-friendlier.
- First-mover risk: Denmark's first greenwashing lawsuit ended in a Supreme Court judgment with a five-year claim ban and front-page publication.
- Concession became the strategy: at the Supreme Court Danish Crown accepted the claims — the admission itself went public, on its own homepage.
The lesson
Green claims need evidence: Danish Crown's 'climate-controlled pig' fell in Denmark's first greenwashing suit — a Supreme Court ban on the climate-friendly-pork slogan followed.
Aftermath
The Supreme Court judgment of 2024 banned Danish Crown from using 'Dansk gris er mere klimavenlig end du tror' for five years and 'klimakontrolleret' for the scheme involved, and ordered the judgment published on danishcrown.com's front page for at least 14 days. A Greenpeace complaint to the Consumer Ombudsman was forwarded to the food administration. Danish Crown had withdrawn the campaign after supermarkets removed the labelled meat in 2021.
Sources
- DR: Danish Crowns brug af 'klimakontrolleret gris' i kampagne var vildledende markedsføring (1 March 2024)
- Dansk Erhverv: Klimagrisen og Danish Crown har nu været i Højesteret (7 August 2024)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Netto called ØGO Denmark's 4th most sustainable brand — consumers only perceived it
Arla called its milk 'net-zero climate footprint' — a Swedish court banned the claim
A snack brand called itself 'nationwide No.1 in sales' on a survey nobody could check
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.