Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2008–2011

Damas founders treated the jeweller's treasury as a personal account

The founding Abdullah brothers made 2,200 unauthorised withdrawals from Dubai jeweller Damas, triggering a DFSA ban and a Dh3bn ($817M) debt restructuring.

Damas International · 2009-10

What happened

Damas was the Middle East's largest jeweller by number of stores, a Dubai institution selling gold and diamonds across the Gulf. Its majority owners — the Abdullah brothers Tamjid, Tawfiq and Tawhid — ran the company's treasury much like a personal account.

Between July 2008 and October 2009 the brothers made 2,200 withdrawals from company accounts without board or shareholder consent. The unauthorised deals totalled Dh614 million and included property investments such as a shopping mall in Turkey and about two tonnes of borrowed gold. The Dubai Financial Services Authority ordered the brothers to repay Dh365 million plus the value of 1.94 million grams of gold, fined Damas and its owners more than Dh13.5 million, dismissed the board, and banned the brothers from holding DIFC board seats for 10 years.

The revelations pushed Damas to the brink. With more than 20 lenders, the company entered a payment standstill in 2010 and in 2011 restructured more than Dh3 billion ($817 million) of debt, with Dh1 billion of 'excess indebtedness' rescheduled over six years. Damas survived and returned to profit under imposed governance — a rare case of a company surviving its founders.

Why it happened

  • Founder control with no functioning board oversight let 2,200 unauthorised withdrawals pass unchallenged.
  • Company funds went to personal and side ventures — property, gold — far outside the jeweller's business.
  • The DFSA ruling forced repayment, fines, board dismissal and 10-year bans: governance imposed by regulator.
  • The scandal froze credit, leaving 20+ lenders in a standstill and a Dh3bn restructuring.
What it costDh3bn ($817M) restructuring; Dh365M repaymentcatastrophic

The lesson

Founder control is not governance. Damas survived only because a regulator installed the oversight its board never exercised — related-party withdrawals can push a market leader to the brink.

Aftermath

Damas emerged from its restructuring, returned to profit, and changed hands under new ownership. The DFSA ruling is cited across the Gulf as the moment the region's regulators showed they would dismantle a founding board to protect creditors — and that a family name on the storefront is not a control environment.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →