Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 1982

Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank lost $37M — unauthorized FX bets went undetected for years

Japan's largest bank discovered its Singapore branch had lost $37M through unauthorized forex trades that went undetected for years.

Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank · 1982-09-24

What happened

Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank (DKB) was Japan's largest commercial bank, formed by the 1971 merger of Dai-Ichi Bank and Nippon Kangyo Bank. It was the flagship bank of the DKB Group keiretsu.

In September 1982, DKB announced that its Singapore branch had lost approximately $37 million (¥9.7 billion) through unauthorized foreign exchange operations carried out over the preceding years. Chief currency trader Haruo Kanda had executed speculative forex positions without the approval of the Tokyo head office.

The loss was one of the earliest major foreign exchange scandals involving a Japanese bank abroad. DKB stated the loss would be treated as an extraordinary item and covered by profits from securities sales. The bank assured the public that the loss would not impede its international operations.

Kanda was dismissed and the Singapore branch manager was reprimanded. The scandal prompted Japanese banks to tighten oversight of their overseas branches, particularly in foreign exchange trading.

Why it happened

  • Haruo Kanda executed unauthorized forex trades without Tokyo's approval, building speculative positions that were not part of the bank's hedging strategy.
  • The unauthorized operations continued for years undetected — DKB's Singapore branch lacked the risk controls to monitor its chief currency trader.
  • The $37M loss had to be covered by profits from securities sales, revealing the bank had no contingency for a trading loss of this size at a single branch.
What it cost$37 million (¥9.7 billion) losscostly

The lesson

A bank's largest branch is only as safe as its smallest control. DKB let a Singapore trader run unauthorized forex bets for years — and discovered them only when the money was gone.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →