Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 1965

Colgate's TV ad shaved sandpaper — the Supreme Court said the demo was a lie

Apr 1965: the Supreme Court upheld the FTC against Colgate — the Rapid-Shave ad 'shaving sandpaper' used a plexiglass mock-up presented as the real thing.

Colgate-Palmolive Company · 1965-04

What happened

Rapid-Shave's television commercial claimed the cream could shave sandpaper: apply, soak, and off in a stroke — with the camera apparently showing exactly that. In reality the 'sandpaper' was a plexiglass sheet covered with sand. Real sandpaper took about eighty minutes of soaking to shave, and on 1960s cameras it looked like blank colored paper anyway. The FTC charged Colgate-Palmolive and issued a cease-and-desist order.

The Seventh Circuit softened the order: if the claim itself was true, it reasoned, a mock-up was just a technique. The Supreme Court reversed in April 1965. Presenting an undisclosed simulation as a real test, the Court held, is a material deception in itself — the viewer is told they are seeing proof with their own eyes, and the fake demonstration misrepresents what they are watching, whatever the product can actually do.

Colgate-Palmolive set the rule every product demonstration still runs under: show the real test, or disclose that it is a simulation. Fifty years later the same logic governs lab scenes, before-and-afters and crash tests — the demonstration is the claim.

Why it happened

  • The sandpaper shave was faked with a plexiglass prop — real sandpaper needed an eighty-minute soak.
  • The ad presented the demo as visual proof the viewer was seeing for themselves.
  • The Supreme Court held an undisclosed mock-up deceptive even when the underlying claim is true.
What it costcease-and-desist upheld by the Supreme Courtembarrassing

The lesson

When an ad presents a demonstration as visual proof, the demonstration must be real: an undisclosed mock-up is deception even if the claim it supports is true.

Aftermath

The cease-and-desist order stood, and advertising demonstrations have been governed by the mock-up rule since. The decision is cited in every modern case about staged tests and simulations sold as evidence.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →