The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 1998–2001
Boots took its UK store format to Japan, opened four shops, and admitted a £25m mistake
Boots entered Japan in 1998 with Mitsubishi using its UK store format. It opened four shops, lost heavily, and in 2001 admitted a £25m mistake and withdrew.
Boots · 2001-07
What happened
Boots, the British pharmacy and health-and-beauty chain, was an early foreign retailer to try Japan. In 1998 it set up a joint venture with Mitsubishi Corporation — the operation was called BMC — and began an ambitious push to plant the Boots brand in a big new market. Mitsubishi supplied local muscle; Boots supplied its name and its store model.
The model was the problem. The Japanese shops were built on the Boots UK Health & Beauty format — large Western-style outlets. Japan's own drugstores are smaller, denser and run on thin margins, and the Boots stores were costly and slow to find shoppers. In the end the venture opened just four shops: three in Tokyo and one in Yokohama.
The losses mounted. The operation lost £12 million in one year and a further £3 million the next, and closure would cost about £10 million more. In July 2001 Boots announced it was closing the stores, conceding that Japanese shoppers loved the brand but not in the form of UK-type health and beauty stores. It called the venture a £25 million mistake.
Boots did not abandon Japan outright — it shifted to a lower-cost approach, putting its own brands such as No7 inside other retailers' space, the model it had used for eight outlets in Taiwan. The case is now a staple of international-business teaching: a strong brand and a strong local partner cannot rescue a store format the market does not want.
Why it happened
- Boots copied its UK Health & Beauty format into a market where drugstores are small, dense and thin-margin, so the large outlets were expensive and slow to attract shoppers.
- The rollout ambition outran what the format could deliver: the venture opened only four stores, far too few to build the scale or presence the plan assumed.
- Boots and Mitsubishi saw the business differently, and the strategic gap left the joint venture unable to adapt the format quickly enough.
- Once the format was proven wrong, the losses — £12m in a year — made continuing more expensive than admitting a £25m mistake and withdrawing.
The lesson
A format that wins at home does not travel by itself. A famous brand and a strong local partner cannot rescue a model the market rejects — adapt the format before setting the rollout target.
Aftermath
Boots kept selling its own-brand products through other retailers in Asia, and later owners expanded the brand internationally in lighter, lower-risk formats. The Japan episode is taught as a market-entry case: entering with an unadapted home-market format and an ambitious store count produces a handful of expensive shops, not a business.
Sources
- Boots walks out on Japan — The Guardian
- Boots pulls out of Japan joint venture as losses grow — The Independent
- Boots and Mitsubishi strategies seen in close of 4 stores — 日本医薬経済社 (jiho.jp)
- Boots ends Japanese venture — The Telegraph
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Espo Waru cosmetics store folded on ¥30M debt — sales never caught the relocation cost
Innisfree closed every one of its own stores in Japan
Masks killed the lipstick, so L'Oréal Paris ended 52 years of makeup in Japan in 2021
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.