The encyclopedia · Marketing & Brand · Marketing decision · 2000
Boo.com burned $188 million in 18 months on a fashion site almost no one could load
Boo.com was a lavish online fashion startup that spent about $188 million in 18 months on offices, parties and a flashy site most users couldn't load. It went.
Boo.com · 2000-05
What happened
Boo.com, founded in 1998, was an online fashion retailer that aimed to be a global luxury brand on the internet. Its founders raised about $188 million and spent it with extraordinary speed and style: offices in a dozen cities around the world, lavish launch parties, a large staff, and an expensive, cutting-edge website.
The website was its undoing. Boo.com's site was built with flashy graphics and required a fast internet connection and the latest software to load — but most customers in 1999 had slow dial-up connections and couldn't load it at all. The site was slow, complex and frustrating, and many would-be shoppers simply gave up. The company was spending a fortune to acquire customers who couldn't even use the product.
Boo.com burned through its $188 million in about eighteen months. With no revenue to match its spending and unable to raise more money as the dot-com bubble burst, it went bankrupt in May 2000 — one of the first and most spectacular dot-com busts. It became a byword for dot-com excess: a company that spent a fortune on everything except the one thing that mattered, a website its customers could actually use.
Why it happened
- Boo.com spent about $188 million in 18 months on offices, parties, staff and a flashy website, with extraordinary burn and little revenue.
- Its website required a fast connection and the latest software that most 1999 customers didn't have, so many couldn't load it at all.
- The company spent a fortune to acquire customers who couldn't even use the product — spending on everything except a usable site.
- When the dot-com bubble burst and funding dried up, the company with no revenue to match its spending went bankrupt.
The lesson
Spending is not progress, and a flashy product is worthless if your customers can't use it. Boo.com burned $188 million in 18 months on offices, parties and a cutting-edge site that most customers.
Aftermath
Boo.com became one of the first and most spectacular dot-com busts, a byword for dot-com excess and a cautionary tale taught in business schools. It burned $188 million in eighteen months on everything except the one thing that mattered — a website its customers could actually use. The lesson is durable: a lavish brand and a cutting-edge product are worthless if your real customers can't access them, and a burn rate untethered from revenue is just a countdown to bankruptcy.
Sources
- Boo.com — Wikipedia (online fashion startup, $188M burned, 2000 bankruptcy)
- Boo.com — Museum of Failure
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Pets.com spent a fortune on a sock-puppet mascot — and lost money on every sale
boohoo lost £263M and renamed itself after the brand it once bought
End. Clothing grew fast, built a warehouse — then lost £43M in one year
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.